Appendix p. 16+17.
To: Professor dr. Halton C. Arp. Institute for astrophysics, Max Planck
From: Leo Vuyk. Weesp, The
Netherlands.
Subject: dumbbell systems
Date: December- 11-1998
Dear
Professor Arp,
Thank you for your book: "Seeing red" (1998, Apeiron Montreal). It is really a gift for the scientific community and others like me. I feel very pleased about the way you mentioned my findings in your book:
That architects
are good recognizers of structures in visual information I knew, but that this
could lead to the accusation, that all the exquisitely trained professional
scientists (page 191) have missed the fact that dumbbell systems in the
universe are acting on all scales, was new for me. For me it was so obvious to
search for these systems, caused by the implications of my model , that I can't
see it as something special. I did read your new book with red ears because-a
lot of pictures where new for me and at the same moment, I recognized a lot of
new patterns which confirmed (from my perspective) my studies I did send you
some years ago (only up to page 31). The newest update of my (model) studies:
Suggestions for the architecture of elementary particles and some universal
consequences (31 pages and appendix 1-11) I send you enclosed. What
I recognized in the new pictures in relation to my model , was that opposite
ejection or in my terms dumbbell systems are indeed of all scales in the
universe, and as a new suggestion: Seyfert galaxies should be galaxies in their
transition process to become more complex galaxies.
This
process could be a confirmation of the scheme in my model (page 26) where I
made systematic sketches of the relation between galaxy types and anchor black
holes. I call them in this letter, anchor black holes, for identification
reasons. (so: in my model they are mentioned as black holes)
If a galaxy
starts with two distant anchor black holes ( I assume: leftovers from the Big
Bang: sorry for leaving the Big Bang untouched): this system will evaluate via
a dumbbell quasar system (such as Cygnus A) into a lenticular galaxy.
This galaxy
will have one white hole in its center (2) which is also the center of the
Higgs-virgin repelling, which is the collecting point of vacuum gas and dust
(bottom of page 26 and described on the following pages up to page 3 1). If two
Anchor black holes areas on one side of lenticular galaxies merge with each
other, these lenticular galaxies will both evaluate into spiral galaxies
because they now have both three anchor black holes (two black holes in common
on one side). In between these black holes and in the middle of the new density
wave circles (10) there will arise new white holes (see page 26 nrs: 2 and 15 )
as new collecting points of gas and dust. ( irregular mini galaxies at one side
of the galaxy).
In the same
way you can imagine what will happen if a spiral galaxy meets a lenticular
galaxy, causing more complexity by introducing more density wave arms . If more
galaxies combine by means of such processes, and the amount of anchor black
holes is growing more or less into a globular form around a spiral galaxy, this
galaxy in the middle of the globe will evaluate into an elliptical galaxy
system. ( page 26: right upper corner, see also page 15: Virgo cluster) The
globular form of the anchor black hole system around the galaxy causes a much
more complex Higgs-virgin repelling zone in between than it did between two or
three anchor black holes.
If via
supernova implosions black holes arise in a galaxy itself, they will start to
search for a second black hole (no violation of the 2 law, because of the
Higgs-virgin propulsion, which is seen as zero point energy (see pages 6-13) . If
a second black hole is found, they become a (small) dumbbell system, which will
repulse due to gas and jet formation in between (see page 12-13 the nrs: 3-9)
As an
example in our own galaxy: see super-luminal repulsed sources , discovered in
our own galaxy by Mirabel and Rodrigues: see copy enclosed: Nature vol.
371, 1 Sept. 1994) These small dumbbell systems should be the origin of all
intra- and some extra galactic ejection of material. Anchor black holes could
be responsible for big extra galactic jets ( in M87)
That the
anchor black holes could become barely visible due to the lack of gas, is
suggested by the galaxy plate NGC 3628 (see appendix page 4: Gaseous halo )
In my view,
high redshifted quasars should be black holes having no mass and a peculiar
gravitational habit. (see: pages 9 and 21) That quasars have a gravitational
effect is already suggested by John Bahcall (see: New Scientist date:
1-21-1995, page 16.)
All this
seems absolute madness but it seems to be also in agreement with my
Higgs-virgin vacuum having zero point energy responsible for all movement of
matter in space.
Sincerely
yours Leo Vuyk.
Appendix Page 18.
Copy from: "Seeing Red" author: Halton Arp, 1998 (editor:
Apeiron Books Montreal, page 191.) http://redshift.vifcom
An Amateur Spots the
Crucial Patterns
The
empirical pattern recognition, which has so drastically changed our view of
extra-galactic astronomy in this book, is based on the recurrent evidence of
pairing of active objects across large low redshift galaxies. The tyranny of
the observations is to insist on opposite ejection of extra galactic material
as a ubiquitous process that operates on all scales. How is it possible that
the exquisitely trained professional scientists have not recognized this
evidence?
To make the
point that it is not the evidence but the viewer that is the key here, I want
to present Figure 7-20. These are examples from a page, which an
architect named Leo Vuyk sent me. He just Xeroxed out the pictures -,which he
found in astronomical publications which showed the same theme over and over
again. He drew in the lines like the delight full childhood game of connecting
the dots together to get the picture. None of us have the correct theory, but
the professional tends to interpret the pictures by using the theory he was
taught while the amateur (Leo Vuyk) tries to use the picture to arrive at a
theory.
Appendix Page 19.
Fig. 7-20. From a page of pictures collected
from the literature by the architect Leo Vuyk. He has drawn in the lines
connecting the companion objects across the central object.
Appendix Page 20.
To:
Professor dr. Halton C. Arp. Institute for astrophysics, Max Planck
From: Leo Vuyk. Weesp. The Netherlands.
Subject: dumbbell systems
Date: December- 11-1998
Dear
professor Arp
According
to my studies on page 31 (bottom): Smaller systems than Galaxies show also
dumbbell structures, like HH jets, LBV's like Eta Carina and Planetary nebulae.
In my studies I recognized LBV's and Planetary nebulae as having two ( anchor)
Black Holes, one on each side. This could indicate, that stars with
planetary systems like our Sun, could be accompanied by two anchor Black Holes
as well!!
If so, we
should be able so discover these Black Holes due to the gravitational lensing
connected to these phenomenae. Seen by telescope from the Earth, the background
stars behind these Black Holes would give variations in light intensity due to
the motion of the Earth.
An other
intriguing phenomenon seems to me the amount of HH objects receding with high
speed from the common source. These objects show a higher redshift than is to
relate to their estimated/ calculated velocities. In "The Physics of Star
Formation and Early Stellar Evolution" (Kluwer isbn:0-7923-1349-6) Bo
Reipurt is concluding: on page 501:For a meaning full interpretation:
HH-spectra must be de-reddened!!!
This should
indicate, that HH-systems are the evolutionary successors of dying stars and
Planetary Nebulae, or even progenitors of young star systems
. Nebulae
like the Pinwheel Planetary Fleming-l could be the intermediate phase!! (see
Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 267, p. 194.)
With kind
regards.
Leo Vuyk.
Appendix Page 21.
To: Professor dr. Halton C. Arp. Institute for
astrophysics, Max Planck
From: Leo Vuyk. Weesp. The Netherlands.
Date: 22-01-99
Subject: micro black holes/
HH objects
Dear
Professor Arp
In
continuation of my e-mail Jan. 21-1999, I think I have an inkling of a solution
for the explanation, that Herbig-Haro objects should represent micro-Black
Holes. According to the existing Black Hole formation theories, via the
implosion of massive stars, these stars should produce only one Black Hole. According
to my model, I don't see any reason to make other speculations.
This means
that I should look into other directions and what I found, is the production of
Ball lightning (see my model the pages 22,23) as an example of a micro Black
Hole. As you will see in my model pages 18-25, there are reasons to postulate,
that Ball lightning is originated by the clicking together of magnetic
particles coming from three different directions. (pages 23-25)
The
magnetic storms at the surface of the sun should produce consequently similar
phenomenae even on a larger scale than on Earth.
According to
my model Black Holes don't melt together as long as there is enough gas in
between them and are presumed to grow steadily only by the accretion of
virgin-Vacuum particles and photons and not by accretion of mass carrying
particles.
This means
that the sun should harbor a growing globular nest of micro- Black Holes in
about the same way as Galaxies should do (according to my model,page:10.).
SUNSPOTS
should be the visual representation of this nest.
A dying
star could spit out this nest in the direction of the two anchor Black Holes.
With kind
regards Leo Vuyk.
Appendix Page 22.
Leo Vuyk, jan. 25-1999
THE DECAY OF QUARKS AND LEPTON
According to the model : suggestions for the
architecture of elementary particles and some cosmological consequences.
According to my
model: elementary particles have a sub-quantum structure, caused by the
postulate that the Higgs-virgin particle is the basic elementary
particle. (see the relation with the model on page: 4 )
Two
Higgs-virgin particles can change form by collision with each other into an electron and
positron pair.(ORO+OLO)
Each
Higgs-virgin particle: (in code) OOO.can change form by collision with a quark or lepton
into one of the 6 different possible types of photons:
1: The
graviton code: LOR
(or ROL) can not click-on to e+ or e- particles to form quarks.
2: The
general photon code
UOU. can click-on to e+ or e- particles, to form quarks for
all red, anti-red (the colors are my own choice) quarks. The general
photon has no quark confinement function, so is not a real gluon.
The 4 (gluon) photon types can also click-on to e+ or e- they are:
3: Magnetic north photon (in
code) ROU, combining for all positive blue- anti blue quarks
4:
Magnetic south photon
LOU, combining for all negative blue- anti blue quarks
5:
Electric + photon
ROR, combining for all positive green- anti green quarks
6:
Electric - photon
LOL. combining for all negative green- anti green quarks
Quarks,
muon and tau particles are click-on combinations of e- and e+'s with 5 different
types of photons: 4 gluon/photon-types and one general photon type. (so: quarks,
muon and tau particles are not elementary)
7: The Z
particle is a
click-on combination of one e- and one e+ particle: (in code) ORO+OLO.
8: The W
particle doesn't
exist as a particle, it is a combination of rotational transitions.
9: The
electron: (in code) ORO
10: The
positron: OLO
11: The
electron neutrino: RLR
12: The
anti electron neutrino: LRL
13: The
muonic neutrino: LLL
14: The anti muonic neutrino: RRR
15: The
Tau neutrino: ULU
16: The
anti Tau neutrino: URU
17: The
muon + particle is
equivalent with the naked anti- green down quark.(OLO+2.ROR)
18: The
muon - particle is
equivalent with the naked green down quark.(ORO+2.LOL)
18: The Tau + particle is equivalent with the naked red charm
quark. (2.OLO+2.UOU)
19: The Tau - particle is equivalent with the naked
anti-red charm quark. (2.ORO+2.LOL)
For coding of quarks see:app.p.23.
Appendix Page 23.
QUARK CLICK_ON COMBINATIONS AND DECAY DIRECTIONS
Appendix Page 24.
The
differences between:
The
electron: e- and the anti-u quark , is one gluon: UOU, LOU or LOL.
The anti-u
quark and the d quark , is one gluon: UOU, LOU or LOL.
The d quark
and the s quark, is one gluon changed form into an e-: into: ORO,
The s quark
and the anti-c quark, is one gluon: UOU, LOU or LOL.
The anti c
quark and the b quark is one gluon changed form into an e- :ORO.
b and
anti-t, is one gluon: UOU, LOU or LOL.
Quark
down-grading or decay is going down the energy ladder. Spitting out e-, e+'s
and gluons in their original form (unchanged) or changed into neutrino's.
Systematic summary of
basic quark decay modes. ( not enclosed)
Jan. 25-1999
Appendix Page 25. Kaon decay and
matter creation.
I
would like to explain the chiral origin
of the strange experimental results of neutral Kaon (Ko) decay, and
matter creation in a CHIRAL universe, which seem to be connected to
each other.
My model is based on real hardrock non-zero sized elementary particles,
as I mentioned before: the Vacuum (ring) particle has three ring hinges,
with freedom possibilities over 90 degr. called L or R and 180 degr.
which is called U. The unchanged ring rotation is called O
Thus the Higgs-virgin vacuum particle in code= OOO
I use electrons and positrons to make compound quarks:
ORO= electron, two half rings with a 90 Left rotation on the "middle
hinge".
OLO= positron, two half rings with a 90 Right rotation on the "middle
hinge".
I use only 2 gluons for the lowest energy levels: ROR, and LOL.
(I call them green anti-green. For other colors see app.p.23)
An u+ quark (u+) is represented by:
OLO+ROR,
the negative charged u-quark (u-) is:
ORO+LOL,
d+ quarks are supposed to have one gluon extra:
OLO+2ROR
the negative charged d-quark (d-) is:
ORO+2LOL,
Strange quarks are based on two compound OLO or ORO, and have
one compound gluon.
Thus:
the s+ quark on the lowest energy level is:
2OLO+ROR,
the negative charged s-quarks (s-) is:
2ORO+LOL,
It is well known that the neutral Kaons (Ko) has a compound s+d- or
s-d+ quark structure, and it is also well known that these combinations
can change into each other without outside influence, so s+d- changes
automatically into s-d+ quark structure and back.
Thus s+- becomes d+, becomes s+ etc. and simultaneously
s- becomes d-, becomes s- etc.
In code terms:
2OLO+ROR becomes> OLO+2ROR becomes> 2OLO+ROR and
simultaneously
2ORO+LOL becomes> ORO+2LOL, becomes> 2ORO+LOL etc.
Thus it is supposed that by mechanical impacts of vacuum oscillations
alone, a positron OLO can change into a compound gluon ROR and back!
and an electron ORO can change into a compound gluon LOL and back.
Now the trick:
In the energetic oscillating Higgs-virgin sea (OOO) the ELECTRON
based quarks are supposed to be MORE VULNERABLE for
disintegration BY THE IMPACTS OF these vacuum oscillations than
positron based quarks, because the vacuum lattice is supposed to
have a chiral structure, and the electron and positron are also chiral
(they have a propeller form).
The vacuum lattice is supposed to be spiraling only in one way Left or
Right, dependant of the universe you live in.
This is supposed to be the reason that we have "long and short
living" Kaons. (CP-violation)
The flip-flop from the s- into d- quark configuration is more vulnerable
than the flip-flop from the s+ into d+ quark configuration, because
it is harder for electrons to recombine into a compound particle than
for a positron .
This mechanism, that it is harder for an electron then for a positron,
in our chiral universe to recombine with gluons into a compound quark
is also postulated to be the reason why in our universe
mainly matter exist and in the opposite universe mainly anti-matter.
See:l the dual anti-mirror symmetric universe idea.
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/
Recently annihilation signs are found in the centre of our Galaxy,
which could indicate that in the centres of Galaxies there is still matter
creation out of the bare vavuum possible.
Leo Vuyk. 5-09-2001 for existence@yahoo.com