The outlines of a Theory of
Everything with Cosmological Non-Local Symmetry at a Distance.
A Chiral “Oscillating Quantum Vacuum Lattice”
and "Big Bang-entanglement"
could lead to the explanation of
how the Quantum Mechanical World is able
to mimic Relativity.
By: Leo Vuyk, Version 21, (December 9-2003)
See also: http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/
And http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
By: Leo Vuyk © all rights reserved.
|
Page : |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Coding of elementary
“Quatron Particles”. |
2 |
|
Quark generations |
|
|
Coding summary 3-D
represented |
|
|
Alternative standard particle
model |
|
|
Quantum gravity. |
|
|
Variable Higgs-virgin
oscillations and Lorentz transformations |
|
|
Quantum gravity around
black holes |
|
|
The Higgs-virgin
repelling zone around black holes |
|
|
Complex Higgs-virgin
repelling zones between two (or more) black holes, as the origin of Galaxies
and Open Star Clusters. |
|
|
4 Tests and other
considerations |
This Site
is under construction, the next articles marked with (X) are NOT enclosed on
this site!!
|
|
|
|
Agreement with
Cosmological observations and dumbbell systems. |
|
|
Talk on ball lightning, |
|
|
Systematic sketches of
interacting anchor black holes , the origin of Galaxy-types |
|
Appendice pages: |
|
|
Sub quantum particle
structure and D. J. Bohm. |
|
|
Examples of the
cosmological consequences date: 9-5-1996 |
|
|
Improved instrument to
measure North- and South magnetic radiation |
|
|
Spin and Dipoles. |
|
|
Atomic Nucleons and magic
numbers. |
|
|
The basic identity of the
Lorentz force. |
|
|
John Bell and Basil Hiley
by Paul Davies. |
|
|
|
|
How the Big Bang started
after a Big Crunch
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Decay of Quarks and
Leptons. Kaon decay and the chiral creation of matter. |
|
|
Rupert
Sheldrake correspondence. |
app. 26-27, app. 28, app. 29, app. 30-32 (X) |
|
How and Why God plays
dice. |
app. 33 (X) |
|
2-stage semi-cold Fractal Big Bang/ ZPE
Galaxy Anchor Black Hole (GABH) propulsion. |
app. 34-35 (X) |
|
|
app. 36-37 (X) |
|
|
Page: I
Introduction.
Suggestions for the architecture of elementary particles and some Universal
consequences.
Sub quantum-level structure
of elementary particles combined with an energetic oscillating Vacuum suggest to
be the base for new physics .
As an architect I was
always interested in form, models, motion
and later in the geometrical aspects of Physics and Astronomy.
I didn't like the impossibility to compose a causal model of the Universe,
therefore I started some 15 years ago with magnetic experiments (page: 19). I
found out that there should be two different sorts of magnetic radiation of the
Earth (North and South). I started to design possible 3D particle models
(page:2-5). The model idea was based on the assumption that there should be a
possibility to design a particle system out of one convertible virgin vacuum
particle. This particle should have form-changing properties with as few as
possible freedom to change and at the same time fitting the particle bill of
the accepted "standard model" as tight as possible.
The idea that light (waves or photons) could not escape from a black hole
introduced the consequence that graviton-photons should have the same problem
as other photons. This introduced to me the concept of a repelling
gravitational energetic oscillating Virgin Vacuum lattice which I called
Higgs-virgin vacuum.
The common idea that
gravitons (with spin-2) should be able to give a negative impulse on
mass-carrying particles and create attraction, without help from another
system, has always been a big question for me.
At the same time this Higgs-virgin vacuum should lose or gain oscillating
impulse energy (or zero point energy ), to explain the origin of vacuum
fluctuations (pair production), the four fundamental forces , and the infinite
energy of the electromagnetic- and the gravitational field, which gave
physicists a major problem.
Consequently photons should have different forms to explain the different
qualities such as electric- magnetic- gravity and gluonic photons. By
introduction of these quality differences compared to the Higgs-virgin particle
it was possible to imagine all four forces of Nature as a result of combined
impulse-differences from Higgs-virgin particles in combinations with other
photon impulses on mass-carrying particles. This system should be the origin of
the planetary motion of electrons, the fuzziness of particles, the chaotic
period of the so called quantum break-time , the energy levels of electrons
exactly fitting into the Riemann numbers , the Heisenberg uncertainty and the
Planck constant .
However, as a consequence,
this Vacuum should have resistance for mass in motion. The so called
"Lorentz polarization" in combination with Higgs-virgin -repelling
and particle dependant memory or EPR consciousness between dual universes, gave
the solution (see introduction).That Higgs-virgin repulsion should be
detectable in space was evident, and introduced the idea of repelling mass less
black holes with a so called clustering potency . (page:10-12 and 26-31). This
introduced a whole new approach to galaxy formation and other not unraveled
cosmological structures, like Eta Carina (page: 26-29). That Higgs-virgin
repelling should lead to new physics and be detectable on Earth surprised me by
accident as a result of our ball-lightning research. (page: 18-23, app:1-2).
The idea that elementary
particles have a specific form, which determines the main property of the
particle is not new. (the sub-quantum level ideas of D. Bohm. or A.Salam
(appendix page:1-2). Therefore it was an interesting new step, to give real
form to specific particles, and see the universe as a mechanical impulse- and
bounce machine, guided by Big Bang- entanglement and based on only one vacuum
particle, to have a base for unification.
This convertable vacuum
particle is called Higgs-Virgin particle and is supposed to oscillate in a
3D-spaceframe lattice configuration, which is supposed to have an incomplete
chiral tetrahedron-octahedron form.
The vacuum particle is
oscillating in chainlike (space frame lattice) connection with other
Higgs-virgin particles. It induces different impulse-energy, depending of the
angle of collision with a 3-D propeller formed mass carrying particles.
Quarks are supposed to be
compound click-on combinations of one or more electrons or positrons as a base,
with five different kinds of photons to clip on. If a photon is
colliding with a mass carrying particle, the impulse difference with the
succeeding "opposite repelling" Higgs-virgin particle is the origin
of the resulting fundamental force. (page:6, app. p. 13). There are no attractive interactions between two particles. There are
only impulse differences between photon impulses and vacuum particle impulses.
Thus the standard Feynmann diagrams, have to be extended with these extra
vacuum interactions.
Leo Vuyk.
Top Home Index
Page:2.
Coding of
elementary “Quatron Particles”.
It is possible to describe
these elementary particles by codes. If we assume that the Higgs-Virgin Vacuum
Torus particle has the ability to change its Torus shape by 90 degree Hinge
ROTATIONS. The Torus is supposed to be
equipped with one splitting point and three Rotational hinge points.
These 4 points are placed regularly over the ring with a spacing between each
other of a quarter part of the ring, which was reason to call these particles
“Quatron Particles”. Each hinge can rotate two adjacent (quarter shaped) ring
pieces relative to each other into 4 positions. With a 90-degree rotational
"click position" for each hinge, thus there are four positions
possible for each hinge. As a consequence, 100 combinations are possible
originated by different rotational “click” positions. These different
rotational positions can be coded.
The coding is based on the
90 degree "click position" of the three hinges of the Torus shaped
(Higgs) vacuum particle.
Simplified representation of
the Vacuum 3D Space Frame Lattice and real Rigid Knotty Particles:
The coding of these
positions are as follows;
U=
UP click position : if the hinge changes the original Torus ring by a 180
degree relative axial rotation between two Torus quarter parts.
O= Circle : if the hinge does not change the original Torus form between two
Torus quarter parts.
L= Left click position: if the hinge changes the original Torus form by a 90
degree relative axial rotation to the left, if the Torus is observed from the
outside
R= Right click position: if the hinge changes the original Torus form by a 90
degree relative axial rotation to the right, if the Torus is observed from the
outside.
To be able to “Click on”
with other particles to form quarks, the Torus should have a diameter relation of ca. 1:7 up to 1:9 between the circular section surface, and the
Torus diameter itself. This is proved by model experiments.
Summary;
Spin; 0 particles; for each particle there are three hinges, thus
the Higgs-virgin (vacuum) particle is coded OOO.
Spin; 1 particles; Photons or Gluons (8 particles are
found see below)
1: The Graviton in this
model is a spin 1 particle instead of a spin 2 particle!!! LOR= ROL= identical.
(not supposed to act also as a gluon)
2: General photon UOU.
(light photon, gamma and x-ray photons) (is supposed to act also as a gluon)
3: El.magn.North photon (=also gluon)= ROU. 4: El.magn.South photon (=also
gluon)= LOU. 5: Electric plus(+) photon (=also gluon)= ROR. 6: Electric
minus(-) photon (=also gluon)= LOL. 7+8: x-ray and gamma ray particle= LOO,
ROO.(not in action as a gluon)
Single Spin 1/2
particles: ( 8
particles) 1: Positron= OLO. 2: Electron= ORO. 3: El. Neutrino= RLR. 4:
Anti-el. Neutrino= LRL. 5: Muonic Neutrino= LLL. 6: Anti mu. Neutrino= RRR. 7: Tau Neutrino= ULU.8:
Anti tau Neutrino= URU.
That is all there is in
basic elementary 3-D particles! (a total of 16 elementary particles + the
Higgs-virgin vacuum particle)
Quarks are not supposed
to be "single" elementary particles, they are click-on combinations
of electrons or positrons with one or two photons, so Quarks are not
elementary, the same as muons Tau leptons , and Z particles !.The W particle does
not exist as a separated entity, it must be interpreted as a combination of
processes.
The transition possibilities, from Higgs-virgin OOO up to neutrinos:
Two OOO particles become after collision with each other> OLO and ORO (e+
and e- pair production) Thus: Higgs-virgin > e+ and e-: representing two
propeller forms with a left and a right "pitch". The middle hinge of
the Higgs-virgin particle O, can rotate over 90 degrees into L or R and
backwards into O, it never rotate into U).
One OOO particle can become
> ROL or LOR ( thus: Higgs-virgin > graviton: The side hinges can rotate
by collision over 90 degrees simultaneously into L and R or R and L ) ROL or
LOR: (The graviton can not rotate over the middle hinge O: consequently, can
not change form into other particles .
One UOU particle (the
general photon) can become > ULU or URU (or: the General photon can become
> Tau or anti-Tau particle; the middle hinge of the general photon O, can
rotate over 90 degrees into L or R, but never into an U) One ROR particle can
become > RLR or RRR (thus: the El.+ photon can become > el. neutrino or
anti-mu-neutrino: the middle hinge O, is rotating into L or R, but never into
an U)
One LOL particle can become > LLL or LRL (thus: the El.- photon can become a
> mu-Neutrino or anti-el. neutrino: the middle hinge O, is rotating into L
or R, but never into an U)
An ROU and LOU particle (the magn. Photons North and South) can not rotate over
the middle hinge O: they can not change form into other particles than
backwards into OOO).
One OLO particle can become > RLR or LLL (thus: the Positron can become
a> el. Neutrino or mu-neutrino: the side hinges can simultaneously change
into LL or RR.) For weak interactions this system is going backwards: each of
these neutrinos can change into a positron.
One ORO particle can become >RRR or LRL (thus: Electron > anti-el.
neutrino or anti-mu neutrino: the side hinges can simultaneously change into LL
or RR.) For weak interactions this system is going backwards: each of these
neutrinos can change into an electron.
A LOL particle or ROR particle can become >UOU. (thus: El- or El+ photon can
rotate into a general photon and backwards, for electromagnetic decays )
For Strong interactions the Higgs-virgin vacuum can produce through collision
of two Higgs-virgin particles a set of: d and anti-d or u and anti-u quarks.
Neutrino creation:
Neutrinos are created by interaction of two Higgs-virgin particles (which
interact from two different directions at the same moment, ) with;
- A; Quark-bounded photons. from
which the middle-hinge changes (spin-1) by 90' clicking (0 becomes L or R)
at the same time spin-1 becomes spip1/2. (e.g.; UOU becomes ULU or URU).
- B; Quark-bounded electrons or positrons
from which the two side hinges change by 90 degree clicking and spin 1/2
stay the same (for inst. OLO becomes RLR or LLL).
- The ROU and LOU ( the magn. South and
North) particles are not able to change into neutrinos because they are a-
symmetrical and consequently doesn’t have the possibility to interact symmetrical
with two Higgs-virgin particles..
A quark-bounded electron (or positron) can through the same (double Higgs-virgin) mechanism change back into a Higgs-virgin particle; (suggested to be active in Neutron decay). Two Higgs-virgin particles can change (by head on bounces) into a set of a positron and an electron.
Five photons: General, Em. North, Em. South, E+ photon and E- photon, combined with the electron and positron are the only building-stones for quarks. Neutrinos are the collision remnants of these particles.
Page:3.
Quark
generations.
Suggestions for Combinations of electrons,
positrons and 5 different types of photons(Gluons) to create compound quark
variations, muon and tau and Z particles.
The three different
colored up-quarks are coded: ORO+LOL, or ORO+LOU, or ORO+UOU. (2 compound
particles)
Anti-up-quarks (three
colors) are coded: OLO+ROR, or OLO+ROU, or OLO+UOU. (2 compound particles)
down-quarks (three colors)
are coded: ORO+2.LOL, or ORO+2.LOU, or ORO+2.UOU. (3 compound particles)
anti-down-quarks (three
colors) are coded: OLO+2.ROR, or OLO+2.ROU, or OLO+2.UOU. (3 compound
particles)
The three
different colored strange-quarks are coded: 2.ORO+LOL, 2.ORO+LOU, or 2.ORO+UOU.
(3 compound particles)
Anti-strange-quarks (three
colors) are coded: 2. OLO+ROR, 2.OLO+ROU, or 2.OLO+UOU. (3 compound particles)
charm-quarks (three colors)
are coded: 2.ORO+2.LOL, 2.ORO+2.LOU, or 2.ORO+2.UOU. (4 compound particles)
anti-charm-quarks (three
colors) are coded: 2.OLO+2.ROR, 2.OLO+2.ROU, or 2.OLO+2.UOU. (4 compound
particles)
The three
different colored bottom-quarks are coded: 3.ORO+LOL, 3.ORO+LOU, or 3.ORO+UOU.
(4 compound particles)
Anti-bottom-quarks (three
colors) are coded: 3. OLO+ROR, 3.OLO+ROU, or 3.OLO+UOU. (4 compound particles)
top-quarks (three colors)
are coded: 3.ORO+2.LOL, 3.ORO+2.LOU, or 3.ORO+2.UOU. (5 compound particles)
anti-top-quarks (three
colors) are coded: 3.OLO+2.ROR, 3.OLO+2.ROU, or 3.OLO+2.UOU. (5 compound
particles)
Muon particles are coded:
mu+: OLO+2ORO, (=anti-d-quark) mu-: ORO+2.LOL.(=d-quark)
Tau particles are coded:
tau+: 2.OLO+2UOU, (= c-quark). tau-: 2ORO+2UOU.(=anti-c-quark)
Together with the Z
particle (ORO+OLO) we suggest that there are 37 different compound particles.
Together with the 16+1
single particles, there are 17+37 = 54 different formed functional particles
used in the universe as we know it.
Different combinations are
still possible, such as for the Ball Lightning interference particle.
Based on model research of
these compound forms, and in line with particle accelerator measurements it
could be stated, that the more compound particles a quark accommodates, the
smaller is its stability, starting to count from 3 compound particles.
QUARK summary of CLICK_ON COMBINATIONS AND DECAY DIRECTIONS
Page:4.
·
Coding
summary 3-Dimensional represented (not enclosed)
Top Home Index
Page 5.
Alternative Standard model (not enclosed, see also app.p.22-24)
Page6.
Quantum
Gravity
QUANTUM GRAVITY, Is the Imbalance between two PUSHING powers (figure A).
Quantum Gravity is the
Imbalance between two pushing powers: the pushing vacuum oscillations (= dark
energy) and the less powerful Graviton vacuum oscillations radiated by
mass. If the vacuum oscillations are
the only universal energy source, pushing around non-energetic quarks and
Leptons, then even Gravity can be interpreted as the net result of the repulsive momentum
transfer, originated by vacuum particle oscillations. The repulsive momentum
transfer can be represented as vectors pointing from all (globular) sides on
Quarks and Leptons. It is postulated that Gravitons do decrease the oscillatory
momentum energy of the vacuum particles only from the radial direction of the
graviton source. Thus the momentum vectors will shorten in length. The
different repelling energies of the vacuum particles- and graviton influences
introduce a combined net repelling force (or anisotropic radiation pressure) on
quarks and Leptons. Thus the repelling Higgs-virgin force from directions
outside the Earth on Quarks and Leptons, will over-compensate the opposing (but
weaker) repelling mixed Higgs-virgin/graviton force, radiated from inside the
Earth, to create the illusion of gravitational "attraction". This is
an illusion because the vacuum oscillatory energy is weakened by the negative
graviton energy. Thus gravity is supposed to be a repelling force, and not an
attractive force.
Mass is the Lorentz covariant Capacity
(Cg) of Quarks and Leptons to transform a specific number (N) of colliding
vacuum particles into (the same number of) gravitons, multiplied by the local
time unit, Cg=N.t. . E=Cg.c^2. Thus mass is based on discrete entities named
gravitons, which are supposed to be real particles (only for a short time) and
a collision product of oscillating vacuum particles and Quarks and Leptons.
Gravitational mass and Inertial mass are equivalent due to this phenomenon.
Gravitons are supposed to transform like all photons after
Figure A, represents a
vertical section through the surface of the Earth. Explanation of the numbers:
1: A mass carrying particle. 2: The Earth surface 3: Incoming oscillations of
the Higgs-virgin particles represented by oscillatory impulse vectors from 360
degrees around the mass carrying particle (The length of the vectors is
representing the effective impulses per local time unit on the mass carrying
particle). 4:The combined Higgs-virgin/graviton impulse vector curve as a
section of the Higgs-virgin/graviton vector globule, representing the average
of Higgs-virgin/graviton pressure on the particle. 5: The perfect (globular)
Higgs-virgin impulse vector curve existing in empty space, without mass
influences. 6: The graviton impulse vector curve represented in addition with the
Higgs-virgin impulse vector curve (3) originating the difference zone (8). 7:
The tidal zone due to the space curvation originating extra incoming
Higgs-virgin-particle oscillations, (see also page: 8, space curvation around a
black hole). 8: The difference zone which is originated by the difference
between upward and downward impulse effects, is the representation of the
Quantum Gravitation. 9: Attention: The graviton impulse vector curve will be
much smaller than sketched in the picture represented by the circle (6).
Page7.
Variable
Higgs-virgin vacuum impulses due to different impulse directions relative to a
fast moving polarized spinning quark or lepton particle, in a preferred vacuum
spaceframe lattice.
VARIABLE HIGGS-VIRGIN IMPULSES AND LORENTZTRANSFORMATIONS
(OR POLARISATIONS Figure B).
Resistanceless
movement through the oscillating Vacuum spaceframe lattice is only possible, if
the effective Higgs-virgin impulses compensate Lorentz covariant, for the
resistance of the moving mass carrying particle (S) created by the oscillating
vacuum frame itself. See Figure B). The mass carrying particle (S), is
suggested to move with the velocity 1/2c. through the oscillating vacuum
spaceframe lattice to the right side of the figure. The number of colliding
Higgs-virgin particles in each time unit and the impulse magnitude is
proportional to the velocity of (S) relative to the vacuum frame.
The mass carrying particle
(S), is suffering more frequent but weaker impulses coming from the front than
from the back side of the particle. Due to the "absolute motion through the
vacuum", the particle is heading its polarized "nose"
proportional into the velocity direction. Consequently less but more massive
vacuum impulses per time unit on the "backside" of the polarized
particle, will compensate the more frequent but weaker impulses coming from the
front. This phenomenon we will call: Lorentz polarization.
This Lorentz-polarization
has three properties: a polarization grade, a polarization direction
and a memory.(as apart of Big Bang entanglement, see also: app.p.29)
So every mass carrying particle has self consciousness (or Big Bang
entanglement) in the way it has a memory for its polarization grade and
velocity direction in Higgs-virgin space.
It sounds odd: The
Higgs-virgin particle impulses on the nose side of (S) are more frequent (with
a higher impact velocity).
However the effective
impulses are less massive than those on the "back side" of the
polarized particle (S), due to the specific propeller form of these polarized
Quarks and Leptons. The total impulse effect must be zero to fit in Special-
and General Relativity. As a result both Higgs-virgin forces (A) are equal.
Page 8.
QUANTUM GRAVITY AROUND A BLACK HOLE.
QUANTUM GRAVITY AROUND THE “NEW” BLACK HOLE, (Figure C).
The black hole is suggested
to EAT the vacuum particles in its dense packed non-zero sized nucleus. The Black
Hole particle nucleus is supposed to be always under heavy pressure of the
incoming vacuum particles. (see page; 21). The black hole nucleus originate a
screening- and sucking effect on the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum, which
should influence the structure of the neighbouring Higgs-virgin space frame. As
a result, the vacuum is constantly EATEN by the nucleus. However ALL SPINNING
PARTICLES will feel the very complex
propulsion of the so called Higgs-Virgin vector Curve (9), which is supposed
the origin of a small “repelling zone” around the Black Hole nucleus. (see
Higgs Virgin Repelling zone:
file:///C:/Mijn%20documenten/homepage1/leo_intro.htm#higgs_repulsion)
Explanation of figure (C).
The sketch is a cross section of a black hole nucleus (1) with: 2: the central
axis of the partly plotted (for clarity) inflow patterns of Higgs-virgin or
photon particle lattices or chains (3) coming from only one direction (3).
3: From other directions there are similar inflow patterns (3). 4: A photon or
better called a photon oscillation (see lines or chain trajectories) which will
be collected by the Black hole.
5: The photons (oscillations) which will pass the black hole, but are
influenced in there trajectory by the in-falling vacuum lattice all around the
black hole. 6: The photons which are in between, will stay on the so called
light horizon,(7). 8: Two distinct mass carrying particles are plotted: one at
the horizon and one outside the horizon (7). 9: gives the distribution pattern
of the inflow of Higgs-virgin particles around the mass carrying particles in
the same way as is represented for Quantum gravity in figure, (A page: 6 )
called the Higgs-virgin vector curve . It is clearly visible, that by the black
hole deformation of the vacuum, the Higgs-virgin-vector curve has a total
different butterfly form. 9; is the cross section over the outline of the
Higgs-virgin vector curve, which has a rotational axis connecting the mass
carrying particle (8) and the black hole (1) The butterfly-like form of the
cross section is originated by the space curvation at that specific location in
the vacuum. As a consequence, space is curved due to really curved trajectories
of the Higgs-virgin photons.
10 and ll: As will be explained in figure (D) there should exist a
Higgs-virgin-repelling zone around a black hole for mass-carrying particles,
with two globular boundary layers, (10 and 11). Contrary to the black hole
repulsion, in special cases the black hole absorbs also mass carrying particles
like quarks and leptons. It is supposed that Quarks and Leptons have the chance
to break through he Black Hole repelling zone only at very high speed (in the
form of high speed jets) (page 9).
Page 9
THE HIGGS-VIRGIN REPELLING ZONE
AROUND A BLACK HOLE, (Figure D).
Explanation of the
numbers:
A: On top of the figure a
horizontal axis is plotted (1) with seven Higgs-virgin vector curves (2)
supposed to be present around mass carrying particles (3), which are thought to
be situated at different distances from the black hole. The black hole is
sketched at the right side of the axis, as a point ( representing the nucleus),
and a circle (representing the black hole horizon).
B: If a
particle in space (3) is attracted by a black hole, only the impulse
differences originated by the local Higgs-virgin vector curve (2) are pushing
the particle in the direction of the black hole with a non-Newtonian gravity
force. This force is non Newtonian because it is only based on the absence of
vacuum particle oscillatory energy, which is supposed to be screened by the
black hole. There is even no graviton energy present coming out of the black
hole, like in figure A (see figure: A)
C: At a certain distance
from the black hole (4), the mass-carrying particle which has a complex
propeller/cone-form (3) will become polarized by the peculiar "vector
curve" of the Higgs-virgin vacuum, and will turn its propeller-nose more
or less in the opposite direction, of the black hole. Thus the lack of
Higgs-virgin oscillations from the direction of the black hole give a
polarization effect on the particle; and as a result it will turn its nose back
from the black hole. This is a comparable effect with the Lorentz
transformation in figure: B.
D: The result of this
polarization is that the total average of Higgs-virgin impulses within each
time-unit, from the direction of the black hole are becoming stronger than the
opposite coming Higgs-virgin impulses.
We will call this important effect: Higgs-virgin repelling effect of a
black hole.
E: At the light horizon (6) of the black hole (on the contrary), the total
average Higgs-virgin impulse is clearly coming only from outside the black hole
because there is no outflow of vacuum oscillations. (see the local Higgs-virgin
vector curve 2). Consequently on this location, there is Higgs-virgin
attraction to the Black hole even for mass carrying particles.. The turning point, where gravity is zero,
is given in point (7).
F: The space in between point (4) and (7) is called: Higgs-virgin Repelling
(Repulsion) zone (8) , which is suggested to be responsible for a lot of
unravelled Cosmological questions, like the origin of Sunspots, matter
spitting Comet Tails, Open star clusters, Single and Double Lobed Quasars, and
the very short time scale of the creation of Galaxies after the Big Bang .
The corresponding Higgs-virgin gravitation diagram is plotted on the axis (9).
At point (4) there is a discontinuous jump originated by the start of the
Lorentz-polarization which can be different for each mass-carrying object. We
sketched an intermitted line representing the average of the jump 10: The space
around the jump zone is supposed to be a real mass trap. This is supposed to be
the zone where the annihilation of anti- and real hydrogen will take place
around Comet Black Holes and Quasars hot spots, as is clearly visible
around the two hot spots of Cygnus
A.
Page 10.
COMPLEX HIGGS-VIRGIN REPELLING ZONES and a WHITE HOLE, BETWEEN TWO BLACK
HOLES,
(Figure E-F).
If two
black holes approach each other, then all gas or dust particles will be driven
into the center of these two Black Holes called : The White Hole, due to a
special repelling effect induced by the vacuum oscillations coming from the
directions of the two black holes. At a certain distance from the black hole ,
the special propeller form of quark- and Lepton particles, is supposed to be
the origin of polarization of the particle. The particle will polarize its
propeller "nose" into the direction where the most vacuum oscillatory
energy is radiated, and by doing so it will be accelerated away from the black
hole. (see also Higgs-repelling, fig. D for comparison) They are accelerated
away from the nearest black hole, due to the extra energetic
Higgs-virgin impulse effect originated by the polarization. Although the vacuum
oscillations from the direction of the black hole, are less energetic than the
oscillations coming from the opposite direction, the net effect is a repulsion
from the Black Hole.
As a consequence, there has
to be a very complex Higgs-virgin-repelling zone in between the two black
holes, which is creating a new phenomenon, a so called "White Hole"
in the middle (8). This "White Hole" is the concentration point of
all the repelled mass carrying particles. Thus in this model a White Hole is
not the mathematical counterpart of a Black Hole !!! Figure (E) gives a cross
section of the two black holes (1) with the spherical Higgs-virgin repelling
zones (2) around them . As a result of interference of these double systems we
postulate in addition two secondary Higgs-virgin repelling "CONES"
(3),which are acting together like a universal vacuum-cleaner. This system of
repelling cones, is collecting particles exactly between these cones' at a
central disc-formed plane (4), and concentrating them into the center point,
the WHITE HOLE.(8). The two interacting black holes we will call "ANCHOR
BLACK HOLES", because they are the origin of the white hole. Consequently
this system we will cal a "DUMBBELL SYSTEM" which is suggested to be
the form-giving base of most universal forms of matter, like our own Galaxy
(figure F).
Figure (F):
The very interesting consequence of this system is, that it gives an
explanation for the form differences of Galaxies and most other universal
dumbbell forms like Quasars, Planetary Nebulae as remnants of exploded Stars (page 27) but also for Open
Star Clusters. The structure of Globular clusters (5) in the halo of Galaxies
are suggested to depend also on this Higgs-virgin-repelling system. If there is
a gliding scale of magnitude from the most massive dumbbell black holes (1) via
the massive star cluster "Anchor Black Holes" downwards to Solar
Anchor Black Holes, we may expect, that the smallest black holes are
situated in the center of a Galaxy. Such a system will grow and is
suggested to be responsible for the inflation of the bulge of a Lenticular or
spiral Galaxy (6) into a more globular form (7). For Elliptical Galaxies (see
page 26), it is assumed that a more complex Anchor Black Hole system is needed,
with more than more than 6 massive
Anchor Black Holes equally distributed around the Elliptical Galaxy system.
Page 11.
Tests and other considerations.
4 tests,
Test 1: Babcock and
Bergman experiment improvement.
The original Babcock and
Bergman (B&B) laboratory experiment [3] was designed to check the relation
of the light speed with two fast (moving) rotating sources. B&B concluded
that there was only a very small correlation grade of 1 % between the
lightspeed and the speed of the glass windows , which was reason to abandon a
theory which supported the addition of velocities (c+/- v) over the whole
length of the light trajectory, so this experiment was interpreted as a support
for Einstein’s light speed constancy. As described before, there is reason to
assume that the light speed relation with the source (c+/-v) is only active for
a trajectory of max.
Better results are expected
if the ratio between the
It is suggested to improve
this experiment, by improving the so called B&B ratio.
A, by decreasing the light
path. For example: if the "free light path" after the light is
leaving the fast rotating glass window (this was in the B&B experiment
B, by placing more glass
windows behind each other. The B&B ratio will also improve by increasing
the number of fast rotating glass windows, (placed at
C, by replacing glass
windows by a set of 4 mirrors creating an omega shaped light path. If the
baseline of the omega path is
D, by a new carrousel alike
system with a fixed central drum inside a rotating drum , both equipped with
mirrors, should give the best opportunity to support or falsify the
E: As an alternative for D,
it must be even possible to use a so called conventional "Sagnac
interferometers" carrousel equipped with 4 or more fast rotating mirrors,
to measure the real "source related lightspeed distance" by the
induced fringe shift.
F: In this theory it is
assumed that inside glass or water, the so called "
Test 2: Electron
Synchrotron diurnal variations.
Despite the Earthly LASOF
oscillating vacuum frame, the Solar LASOF oscillating vacuum frame, should have
a diurnal subtle influence on microwave radiation intensities of synchrotron
rings, measured up and down the radiation direction, which is most in line with
the orbital propagation direction of the Earth around the sun. The lightspeed
around the Earth is made constant by the LASOF, however the LASOF doesn’t
influence the vacuum lattice structure itself. Thus fast moving electrons in a
synchrotron ring (CERN etc.) have to deal with the "ether wind" of
the Earth speed inside the Solar centred reference frame of the vacuum lattice,
which will influence the synchrotron microwave radiation in a subtle diurnal
way.
However until now all the
diurnal effects which are measured in synchrotron rings, are as a matter of
fact thought to be the influences of other exterior perturbations, like the
Solar gravitational influence or the oblateness of the Earth which deforms the
synchrotron ring in a subtle way. Because the runtime- filling time of these
rings is relatively short, (ca. 12 hours). However it must be not so hard to
show sidereal time relations of the
diurnal effects.
Test 3: Dual GPS or dual
mountain summit, one-way Lightspeed tests outside the isotropic LASOF area.
It is postulated that the
earth is floating within an oscillating quantum vacuum frame, which by
itself has a specific orbital velocity
relative to the solar system. Until now Two isotropic lightspeed bubbles
(LASOFs) located at both sides of the earth prevented the measurement of firm
lightspeed differences.
As a consequence, it is
postulated that a quantum vacuum must
originate a measurable ether drift
effect, which should be measured at best at mountain summits or in space by the
difference in the (one way) light speed between two GPS or GEO satellites (up
and down). These speed differences should be measured more or less parallel
with the orbital propagation direction of the Earth around the sun and even
parallel with other possible ether drift directions of the earth.. Until now,
only a small Earth velocities are
measured .
e.g. by A: 2001: Yu.M.Galaev, "Ethereal
Wind in Experience of Millimetric Radiowave Propagation" (between two
mountain summits) ,
http://www.spacetime.narod.ru/0010-pdf.zip and
Dayton Miller in 1926, see: James
DeMeo : http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm at mount Wilson. Dayton Miller
published his findings in: Review of
modern physics 5, 203-242 (1933) called: “The Ether drift experiments and the
determination of absolute motion of the earth.
Miller concluded however that these subtle results where still in line
with SR.
However, professor H. A.
Munera and M. Allais, have shown us the
way to interpret Millers ether drift measurements in a more conclusive anti-SR
way. See: : http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-272/aflb272p463.pdf http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-272/aflb272p463.htm
http://allais.maurice.free.fr/English/media12-1.htm
For this model it is
assumed that Millers results where handicapped by the influence of the LASOF
and a kind of “semi-Lorentz contraction”
of rods. The Earthly LASOF ("Local A-symmetrical Oscillating
Vacuum Frame") are supposed to be
two isotropic light speed bubbles, which compensate the ether drift
effects in general and especially in Spring and Autumn. The proposed
GPS experiment should be able to
check more clearly the orbital speed of the Earth around the sun and other ether drift directions of the earth, if
it is done outside these LASOF areas.
GPS one-way light speed and
other experiments have proven that there is
no “one-way light speed difference” measurable in more or less perpendicular directions relative to surface of the Earth.
If this was the case by ether drift effects the whole GPS system would not work
with such a precision. At the same time however, the quantum vacuum and the
earth should have a relative motion to
each other which should be measurable as a so called “Ether drift”.
Interestingly, this is the case by the measurements of D. Miller , which where
made only in the horizontal plane, where the GPS has its flaws.
To solve this
contradiction, it is assumed that massive objects like the earth create their own isotropic light speed
bubbles at both sides of these massive objects, called LASOFs. These bubbles
are supposed to be shaped in a double
cone form with a common axis pointing always parallel to the orbital motion of
the earth around the sun and the earth as the centre point. Secondly, if we
assume that there is also a second ether drift perpendicular to the equatorial
plane of the Sun, (also measured by D. Miller)
then a second LASOF double cone should be introduced. Both LASOF systems
are supposed to have a decreasing influence on the vacuum light speed measured
parallel to the surface of the earth at increasing Altitudes. (Millers
experiment was made at the top of mount Wilson U.S.A.) Consequently it is proposed that the GPS altitude, will be sufficient to measure
more clearly the real vacuum correlated
light speed differences into the “up or down” direction between two
Satellites. In future experiments even "inter satellite
tracking" e.g. between two so
called block II GPS satellites and only one Ground Station should give enough
information to check the existence of LASOFs.
Test 4: Large Sagnac Laser
Ring Interferometer "LASOF crossing" variations.
In spite of the former
assumption that the vacuum drift should be measured at GPS altitude or mountain
summits, there are some indications that even inside the earth the LASOF has measurable effects on the local light speed differences. It is assumed that a large Sagnac Laser Ring
interferometer with enough "internal surface" or "light arm
separation" designed to detect only subtle changes in the Rotation of the Earth, could also be used for detecting
subtle LOCAL lightspeed differences, in
the up and down direction between the
individual Sagnac Ring arm trajectories.
This is an experiment which is already in action at the Canterbury Ultra-G Ring
Laser Project at
The LASOF double cone main
axis, is supposed to have a stable orientation parallel with the orbital
trajectory of the Earth around the Sun. As a consequence, subtle local
lightspeed variations are supposed to be measurable on locations placed between
45 degrees North or South Latitude. The double cone shape of the LASOF is
supposed to have two circular sections with the surface of the earth located
opposite to each other at both sides of the earth, with the common circular
symmetry axis pointing through the centre of the earth, parallel with the
orbital motion of the earth around the sun .
This effect is already
measured by the Stedman team: see: the first Ultra-G (UG-1) results 1-14
January 2002 : http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/research/ring_laser/UG0102.pdf The transition of 4 into 2 fold
frequency shift variations each day, exactly on the 10th of January 2002, is in
line with my so called LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
boundary predictions.
A daily 4-fold lightspeed
variation change into a two fold variation on the 10th of
January is the reason to suggest that
the LASOF boundary circle at that time in the Cashmere Cavern must reach down to about 45 degrees Southern
Latitude, because the latitude of the Cashmere Cavern itself is Southern-Latitude:
43 degrees, which is 2 degrees within the maximal LASOF cone. The 4 fold
lightspeed variations are supposed to indicate that both of the LASOFs
circles are crossed. After the 10th of January it is supposed
that only one of the LASOFs are crossed due to the different orientation of the
Polar rotational axis of the earth
relative to the LASOF axis, parallel to the orbital direction of the earth.
In summer and winter times,
around 21 June and 21 December the 4 fold lightspeed variation change will have
a maximum distance during the day. Due to the orbital change in the Polar
rotational axis of the Earth. As a consequence we may expect, that during each
year, the "transition" data which change the daily 4-fold variation
into 2-fold frequency variation, will be on the 10th of January and the 10th of
July and the "transition" data which change the daily 2-fold
variation into 4-fold frequency variation, will be on the 1st of June and the
1st of December:.
The Moon LASOF.
If the Earth has a LASOF
the Moon should have also one. If the moons position is
exactly in “front or at the backside” of
the Earth’s orbital motion axis around
the Sun, the UG-1 Ring Laser in New
Zealand, should give a clear “jump” inside the Sagnac signal for a period of several
hours. Consequently this is expected to happen at the First and Last quarter
position of the Moon, when the moon is located within the ecliptic plane at the
so called nodal position. Information from Cashmere Cavern UG-1 seem to support
this phenomenon for 31 august 2002. However, if as Dayton Miller measured there
is reason to assume also an ether drift along the axis of the Solar planetary
plane, then the moon influence on the Ultra Large Sagnac Laser measurements is
expected to be also present at other quarter positions of the moon. This will
become clear only after publication of the UG-1 measurements by the Stedman
team in the near future.
The Earthly LASOF or E-LASOF double cone.
In spite of all the
"one-way tests of light speed isotropy" made in history, which are
all consistent with Special Relativity, it is obvious that these experiments
does not account for "non-isotropic light speed bubbles" on both
sides of the Earth, or the "photon transition" within
According to this model,
the Earth is cruising through a Solar centered oscillating vacuum lattice
frame. This vacuum lattice is connected to the Sun, by the influence of Two so
called "Stellar Anchor Black Holes" (SABHs) located on both sides of
the planetary plane at about 1 light year distance of the sun.
It is postulated that in
the neighborhood of mass concentrations (e.g. the Earth), the speed of the
photonic wavefunction expands a-symmetrically relative to this Solar reference
frame in a complex non-isotropic way. ( see before: "Microscopic
Amplitude Variation, the origin of the constancy of the speed of light")
As a consequence, the
Earth in motion relative to the Solar reference frame, is equipped with its own
mimicked (imperfect) reference frame, which is supposed to have a complex form
based on a Double Cone or hyperboloid. This Double Cone we will call: the
"Earthly- Local A-Symmetric Oscillating vacuum Frame"
(E-LASOF).
The summits of the two
cones of the double cone, are supposed to coincide with the center of the
earth. The Cone summit angles are supposed to be 90 degrees which is based on
recent Sagnac Interferometer "Ring Laser Project" measurements in
Canterbury university (Christchurch, New Zealand = 43 degrees latitude South) .
Inside these cones it is supposed that the speed of light is constant within
the limits of the so called "extinction distance" (described before )
in all directions, related to the geometry of the double cones, and not related
to the ROTATING Earthly surface. Outside these Double Cones it is supposed that
the Solar vacuum reference frame (or S-LASOF) must be accounted for with an
exception for an Earthly cylindrical volume with the same diameter as the Earth
and connecting the two E-LASOF cones.
The major symmetry axis of
the E- LASOF double cone and the cylinder, is always pointing parallel with the
direction of the Earthly orbital motion around the sun. One cone of the E-LASOF
is located at the front-, and one cone is located at the backside of the Earth
relative to the orbital motion. As a consequence, the E-LASOF Double Cone is
supposed to intersect the Earthly surface by two giant circular LASOF SURFACES.
Due to the top angle (90 degrees) of the LASOF double cones, the circular LASOF
SURFACES will have a diameter of ¼ of the planet circumference.
"A-symmetric
oscillating" in a E-LASOF, means that the Higgs-virgin vacuum particle
oscillations measured in different lattice directions, have a different
anti-symmetric spiraling/sinusoidal form related to the time-base.
The Inter shaped
cylindrical area around the Earth, connecting the double cone, is supposed to
have is supposed to have ONLY lightspeed isotropy with the double cones into
the direction parallel with the main double cone axis. This is the reason why
it should be possible to measure the speed of the Earth in the reference frame
of the Sun by GPS "one-way" signal speed difference measurements (see
4 tests) if these GPS spacecrafts are in positions outside the E-LASOF.
The Solar LASOF or S-LASOF.
The Solar LASOF is supposed
to have an REVERSED double cone form. The Solar LASOF should be interpreted as
reversed double coned reference frame which is locally fixed to its
so-called "Stellar Anchor black hole" system. In this
model we may call this: the solar dual anchor black hole system, which has the
form of a dumbbell, with reversed double coned LASOFs in between the black
holes. As a consequence, The LASOF of the Earth is acting within the Solar
LASOF. In YOUNG stars, the Solar anchor black holes (SABHs) are spotted and
described as "glowing caps" or "bow shocks" at the end of
the dual jets, see: HH 34, http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991129.html . We noticed, that in DYING stars
(in Planetary nebula) these anchor black holes are also often visible as
bipolar bow shocks , see M2-9: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990321.html
It is supposed, that the
E-LASOF is the main reason why so called first order (one way) light velocity
measurements with the Global Positioning System are only accurate, if the
measurement direction from the Satellites is directed more or less
perpendicular to the Earth surface. GPS Measurement directions which have a small
Earth surface angle become often inefficient, mainly due to the distortion of
the light speed represented by the absence of LASOF perpendicular to the orbit
direction of the Earth around the Sun. As a result, the orbital velocity of the
earth around the sun relative to the solar reference frame, should be
measurable by future one way velocity experiments of the GPS. (The so called
Sagnac effect which is originated by the Earth rotation itself, is already
converted in the GPS system)
Just like the Canterbury
Sagnac Ring Laser project results ( http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/research/ring_laser/ring_2000_html ), GPS Satellite High precision
time comparison "one-way" light speed experiments show periodic
(light speed) variations. These variations are mentioned as a
"problem", and "insufficient agreement in results", which
"remain to be settled" see:[4].(Saburi, IEEE, IM 25, no 4 dec 1976,
pp. 475). Saburi concluded: "Thus two problems , the existence of small
and periodic variations and an insufficient agreement in results, remain to be
settled".
As a consequence, this
model is in MEASURABLE DISCORDANCE with Einstein’s Special relativity which
says that light will always travel at a constant rate, regardless of the frame
of reference. The Higgs-virgin oscillating LASOF influenced cosmos mimics most
–but not all- the predictions of special- and general relativity, which lead to
several realistic falsifying or supporting tests for this model.
Stellar aberration.
The well known
"Stellar aberration experiment" made by Bradley (1725!) is also
supporting the idea that the Earth is floating within a stationary light
medium. Thus it is not falsifying the idea of some sort of isotropic Lightspeed bubbles like LASOFs around the earth.
Outside the-LASOF
areas, the SOLAR LASOF reference frame
is supposed to be unchanged as the stationary or semi-stationary light medium.
Consequently, outside the LASOF areas, so
called "one-way signal speed" measurements between two GPS or GEO
satellites, made in a direction parallel with propagation of the Earth around
the Sun, should be able to prove the difference of the light speed. [2] (Phys.Rev.Letters. vol 1, no 9, 1958,
p.342-343, [3] Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1964,v 54,no,2
p.147-151.
Anti-relativity GPS "one way" light speed test, outside the
"LASOF Double cone".
One of the future
experiments to check this model is based on the prediction, that it should be
possible to measure "some" influence (more influence that D. Miller
measured) of the speed of the Earth through the Solar vacuum reference frame by
special "one way" GPS signalling speed measurements. This experiment
has to be done more or less outside the influence of the so called "LASOF
Double Cone" or "Local a-symmetric Oscillating vacuum Frame"
(see: LASOF Double Cone below), which is originated by the interaction of the
Earth with the oscillating vacuum lattice. The Solar vacuum frame is supposed
to be anchored around the sun, and is not rotating around the sun relative to
the galaxy center.
This experiment can be
done, by measuring the difference in the signalling speed between two GPS or
other satellites, at the moment that
these satellites are able to exchange signals, in the up or down (vacuum wind)
direction of the motion of the Earth (30 km/sec.) around the sun. Thus it is
proposed to measure the signal speed difference between two satellites, in a direction which is chosen
more or less PARALLEL with the axis of the Earthly propagation around the sun,
to check the influence on the measurement of the speed of the Earth (30
km/second) relative to the Solar reference frame.
Universal change of Alpha and the light speed.
The recent discovery of the
variation of the electromagnetic coupling constant (or fine-structure constant)
Alpha, seem to introduce a new light speed perspective in the physical
community. (John K. Webb. /P. Davies: "the speed of light has
changed" http://www.pr.mq.edu.au/events/index.asp?ItemID=607 )
In this Oscillating Quantum
Vacuum (OQV) Lattice model, it is assumed that the Vacuum Lattice measured from
the center to the rim of our universe, becomes more and more "structural
anti-symmetric" in redshift, due to the absorption of the Vacuum Lattice
by Dark Matter (spacetime curvation), located around Galaxies in the form of
"Galaxy Anchor Black Holes" (GABH’s), Galaxy Halo Black Holes (GHBHs)
and smaller within Galaxies: Stellar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs), Comets, etc.
(see: semi cold dual Fractal Big Bang.) . This anti-symmetry in redshift, can
be compared with the LASOF areas (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame)
connected to massive objects.
As a consequence it is
assumed that the "Hubble redshift" is originated not by the expansion
of the universes, but by this Dark Matter/ Black Hole absorption effect. As a
result, the universal change in the Lightspeed (or alpha change) suggested by
P.Davies should be not continuous.
This discontinuity is
supposed to be originated by the increased vacuum absorption rate of GABH’s
located in the center of the universe, which must be more evolved than the
GABH’s at the universal rim, if we include the effect of the so called
"look back time". It is assumed that somewhere in between this
distance, the lightspeed ( or alpha) change is decreased. This effect can be
seen at: "Michael Murphy’s Research" page. At http://bat.phys.unsw.edu.au/%7Emim/res.html figure: 2, between 0,65 and 0,85
"Fractional look-back time" we can see a structural decrease of the
alpha change, which is supposed to be the result of the former described
effect.
It is proposed that even
the recent discovery of the "acceleration of the universal expansion"
measured by comparing so called Type 1a Supernova data should be also
originated by the same increased vacuum absorption rate of GABH’s in the center
of the universe.
Ergodic Hypothesis.
The former proposal for a
vacuum lattice has parallels with the "Ergodic Hypothesis" in
classical mechanics. It was Boltzmann who proposed the so called "Ergodic
Hypothesis", (Greek: erg+hodos= energy path) also called: the
"continuity of path" by Maxwell. Ergodicity of a system has been the
fundamental assumption of classical mechanics, and it is also used in computer
simulation practice. Thus if we want to represent the vacuum lattice qualities,
it seems plausible to use Ergodic math. The vacuum seems also to be a
computational system with so called "excitable cellular automata".
There are two families of excitable cellular automata : the Greenberg-Hastings
model (GHM) and the Cyclic Cellular Automaton (GCA). Each family consists of
local deterministic oscillating lattice dynamics. See: http://arxiv.org/abs/patt-sol/9303002
TWO HISTORICAL MISINTERPRETATIONS OF EXPERIMENTS made by Babcock and
Bergmann (1964) and K. Brecher (2000), a good bye to the "Occam’s razor"
criterion..
The LASOF light speed change or the "source to extinction
distance"
Inside the LASOF (Local
A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) areas on both sides of the orbiting
object, the light speed around a massive object like the Earth, is supposed to
be related to the object, within a specific redial distance, which can be
called the "source to extinction distance".
It is to credit Robert S.
Fritzius, who gathered parallel ideas on "extinction distances"., He
found that Walter Ritz and R.Tolman did already find evidence for extinction
distances, which was called "Ritz ballistic hypothesis" resp.
"Tolman extinction" (or "source to extinction distance").
In the paper of Fritzius, called "Stellar Gamma-ray lashes" : http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/grbs.htm he presented both interpretations:
we quote as follows:
Kenneth Brecher gave a paper on testing special relativity using Gamma
Ray bursts at the April 2000 APS meeting in
R. Fritzius
comment: According to John Fox(4), Tolman's " source-to-extinction
distance" has to be used in calculations, such as in Brecher's special
relativity test, rather than the source-to-observer distance. (For
cosmological distances the former is generally very much shorter than the
latter.) When we plug in the extinction distance, as calculated for the Crab
pulsar in another part of this presentation, L=2.6*10^10cm, (which is 2.6*10^5
Km or approximately 0.7 times the Earth-Moon distance) we arrive at a
much fuzzier result for this SR test, i.e., k=5.8*10^-3.
According to the
expected mass difference between the Crab pulsar and the Earth, it is likely to
assume, that the "source to extinction distance" of the Earthly LASOF
double cones postulated by this model, could be expected to be much less than
0.7x the Earth Moon distance.
At the same time it is
shown that the interpretation mistake, (to calculate with the "source to
observer distance") made by Kenneth Brecher, is the same mistake as is
made in the "Babcock and Bergman" experiment within the laboratory
(see below: "the
The
The well known Babcock and
Bergman (B&B) experiment called "Determination of the Constancy of the
speed of light" [3] (originally done by Kantor in air) was designed to
discover the relation between the light speed and the light source ( by placing
two fast rotating glass windows in the light beam trajectories. The B&B
experiment was done in a vacuum chamber). The goal was to check the SR
postulate, that the speed of light is a constant for all observers, regardless
of their motion relative to the source of the light. The B&B experiment
supported the light speed invariance up to a subtle 0,7 % structural anomaly,
which could not be explained.
This small but structural
light speed anomaly was structural related to the fast moving (rotating) glass
windows. On page 151, of [3] Babcock writes: "it is only claimed here that
the (fringe) shift between rotating conditions was less that 0.02 fringe, a
value to be compared with the shift of 2,9 fringes predicted on the assumption
of addition of velocities". "It is also concluded that the results
are, to within their own precision, in agreement with the prediction of the
theory of relativity". Thus B&B measurements where interpreted as
supporting the 2e postulate, because the fringe shift was ALWAYS
POSITIVE RELATED TO THE SPEED OF THE SOURCE, although it was very small.
However the B&B
experiment supported the 2e postulate ONLY if it is assumed, that
the WHOLE "free" light beam trajectory (between the glass window and
the fixed reflecting mirrors =
If we don’t take the whole
trajectory of the light beam into account, and suggest that there is some kind
of a "source to extinction distance" active, THEN a simple
calculation tells us that the ratio of 0.02/2,9 is 0,7 % , so (0,7/100x140=
Conclusion: we may
calculate that the speed of light has a speed relation with the (fast) moving
glass window source only over ca.
We will raise this effect to the "
5 new Postulates on the lightspeed around massive bodies.
The local speed of light
and the "stretching and compactification" of the spiraling light wave
in the local vacuum lattice reference frame, is supposed to be influenced by
mass according to 5 new light speed postulates. These postulates refute the
universality of Special Relativity, and introduces the existence of local light
speed (LASOF) boundaries. These postulates are:
1: that all celestial
massive bodies moving (orbiting) in the local lattice vacuum reference frame ,
are equipped with "double cone" formed areas with special
an-isotropic light speed properties called LASOFs, (Local Anti-Symmetrical
Oscillating vacuum Frame) located on either sides of the moving object. The
main axes of this double cone are inline with each other and in line with the
propagation direction of the object through the vacuum lattice. These LASOFs
mimic Special Relativity rules about the lightspeed, and are the origin of the
misinterpretation of the constant lightspeed by the Special Relativity theory.
The LASOFs are only effective to compensate for Special Relativity
requirements, for velocities under 1/8 of the light speed of the moving object
related to the vacuum reference frame.
2: that inside these LASOF
areas, the light speed is related both, to the moving object and the vacuum
reference frame with a changing ratio from 100% to 0%, dependent of the
distance to the object in motion called the "distance of extinction".
Inside the LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) areas on both
sides of the orbiting object, the light speed around a massive object like the
Earth, is supposed to be related to the object, within a specific redial distance,
which can be called the "source to extinction distance".
3: that the dimensions of
the LASOF areas are related to the total mass in motion and the mass density of
the object. (However, the light speed is in the first place always related to
the light emitting object over a mass dependent minimum
4: that stars like the Sun
are also floating in the center of a so called "Secondary Stellar
LASOF", which has the form of a double cone, with the circular bases
located into one common central plane of different space structure. These cones
are originated by two massless so called "Stellar Anchor Black Holes"
(SABH’s) of medium size, each located at one of the summits of the double cone.
The Solar planetary plane is supposed to be orientated perpendicular to the
common central axis of these cones, and centered within the common circular
cone bases.
As a first possible
evidence in space of such a secondary LASOF, we found a so called "Highly
ordered Faraday Rotation Structure in the Interstellar Medium" in the form
of a double cone, with a central plane of different polarization, by B.
Uyaniker and T.L. Landecker.(Astr.Ph.J. 575:225-233. 2002, 10 aug. See also: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/ps/0204/0204274.f3.jpg .
These Solar Anchor black
holes (SABH’s) are supposed to "Eat" or absorb the energetic
oscillating vacuum, at both sides (North and South) of the sun, which should be
the origin of the "Solar LASOF" which is supposed to have an extra
influence on the vacuum structure. The vacuum "eating" of these black
holes is reason to postulate that the SOLAR LASOF is not based on a-symmetrical
oscillations, but on vacuum lattice "drag" by the two Solar Black
Holes, together with all the other Stellar- and Galaxy Anchor Black Holes
(SABHs and GABHs) of the Milky way. SABH’s are supposed to be identifiable by
their gravitational micro-lensing effect on background stars, showing asymmetry
due to the Earth’s orbital location shift during the year. It is supposed that
this identification could be extracted from existing terrestrial astronomical
photographs.
5: that each Galaxy is
supposed to have a complex " Tertiary Galaxy Halo LASOF" structure
around, originated by at least two Massive "Anchor Black Holes"
comparable with the Stellar Anchor Black Hole/LASOF combination. These so
called Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABH’s) are supposed to be identical with the
well known primordial black holes (PBH’s), left over from the Big Bang and
recently recognized by astronomers as "gravitational lensing"
satellite CDM substructure in Galaxies and Galaxy clusters.
(The Galaxy Anchor Black
Holes, together with the smaller Stellar Anchor Black Hole systems, are
supposed to "eat" the vacuum, which is the origin of phenomena like
the Gravitational Lensing, the Hubble Redshift, Dark (missing) Matter,
Spacetime distortion, the universal evolutionary clock. This universal clock is
based on the absorption of the vacuum lattice by dark matter (black holes), the
origin of the future Big Crunch. The number and distribution of GABH’s is
supposed to be responsible for the differences between Galaxy types. In "quadruple
gravitational lenses" like PG1115-080 the measured anomalous "flux
ratios" of the 4 different images, are indicating that these quadruple
images are not representing the same Background Quasar, but instead 4 different
satellite GABH’s, surrounding in tetrahedron configuration the central
Elliptical Galaxy). (N.Dalal ) http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/castles/Individual/PG1115.html
The Particle -Vacuum Lightspeed relation.
The light medium is a
linear oscillating particle based 3D space frame in the form of a chiral (left
or right handed) incomplete tetrahedron lattice .Two oscillating vacuum
particles oscillate in opposite direction along the same linear vacuum lattice
and transfer photonic information between the two nodal points at each end of a
lattice.
Matter (quarks and leptons)
is made of ether particles which change
their shape by collision into tiny -two armed- chiral propellers, which are
supposed to have real spin by the continuous traction of colliding oscillating
vacuum particles. Each collision
between quarks or leptons with vacuum particles, does change the vacuum
particle, dependent of the angle of collision, into a different shaped photon,
gluon or graviton (all without a chiral propeller form).
Photon particles are
supposed to be able to collide, merge and separate again from one specific
Lepton and in succession change back as a “neutral” oscillating vacuum particle
inside the vacuum lattice. If photon particles don’t merge within
Gluon particles are
supposed to collide, merge and separate again from one specific Quark and in
succession change back as a “neutral” oscillating vacuum particle inside the
vacuum lattice.
Graviton particles are
supposed to be only able to collide with Leptons and Quarks and in succession
change back after a trajectory of
This system is called: the
disruption and repairing system of the vacuum, which is responsible for
diffraction, refraction and dispersion inside and around atoms, and is the
origin of the differences in the lightspeed through transparent media like
Glass, Water and Air.
The local speed of light is
less than the local photonic information speed along each vacuum lattice,
because there are no straight connected lattices inside the vacuum lattice. The
lightspeed in a clean vacuum lattice is 4/7 of the vacuum lattice transfer
speed of light along the lattices. The minimum lightspeed could be temporary
zero, if the vacuum is able to transfer the light information in circles inside
the tetrahedron vacuum lattice.
Due to the disruption
process of the vacuum lattice inside (transparent) matter, the photonic
information trajectories are also disrupted, which forces the photonic
information transfer process along the vacuum lattices, to take a longer route through the lattice,
which decreases the lightspeed.
If the vacuum frame lattice
is in motion relative to (transparent) matter both will become polarized which
has a relative influence on the internal lightspeed (Fizeau experiment) and all
other SR effects such as time delay, mass increase and probably no length
contraction at all.
Massive objects in relative
motion with the vacuum lattice will originate two isotropic lightspeed vacuum
cones in front and at the backside of the massive object. The vacuum will
become an anti-symmetric oscillation pattern, which is called: “Local
Anti-symmetric oscillating vacuum Frame”(LASOF).
The LASOF influence is
supposed to decrease and die out after a certain distance of extinction, which
is dependant of the total mass of the object. This is the reason why the
one-way lightspeed measured more or less perpendicular to the surface of the
earth seems to be constant at all places. (GPS) However GPS one-way
measurements will become disturbed by the vacuum lattice in motion outside the
LASOF areas and if the measurements are made more or less parallel with the
surface of the earth. (see: 4 tests
below)
Knotty Jets, the Tell Tales for Early Dark Matter and Spiral Galaxy
formation.
It is proposed that the new paradigm for Black Holes with a nuclear
particle content, (see before) lead
to a 2 stage semi-cold Black Hole
evaporating Big Bang see http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 which is supposed to be the
origin of “simple” progenitor Spiral Galaxies equipped
with at least one so called Galaxy Anchor Black Hole (GABH) at either side of
the disk.
These Early simple what I call “dumbbell” Spirals are
supposed to be able to merge, however without the merging of the GABHs itself.
This merging prohibition is part of the new paradigm
for Black Holes, which tell us that Black Holes only merge if the vacuum
structure/pressure has become insufficient, as is supposed to happen in the so
called Big Crunch. Second, that Black Holes Repel single atoms thus gas clouds,
but attract massive stars, which is supposed to be the origin of all dwarf
globular stellar concentrations.
If there is still Gas in the neighborhood of these
GABHs it is proposed that a Dwarf Irregular
Galaxy in between these GABHs is formed, or even a Dwarf Spheroidal
Galaxy .
If there are enough stars available from Galaxy
merging activities: GABHs can capture these stars and form Elliptical shaped star clusters around
themselves called Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies.
Consequently these GABHs will stay isolated and will
form two axial orientated "Tree alike" outer Halos of the Spiral
System.
Within Early Spiral Galaxies, these GABHs are supposed to form
axial located strings which can be identified as Knots inside Jets produced by
the Spiral Radio Galaxies. It is well known that these knots don't move inside
these Jets, which is in line with the new GABH paradigm that Black Hole nuclei
are supposed to be “Locked up “ within the oscillating vacuum structure. See also: 3C303 http://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/source-d.cgi?3C_303
The Spiral galaxy 0313-192 is supposed to be an
example of a Spiral with GABH induced extended Halos in "Tree" form
see http://www.astr.ua.edu/keel/research/rg0313.html
It is proposed That these GABHs can collect stars and form Dim Dwarfs
Ellipticals Galaxies. In addition it is proposed that in between these strings
of GABHs, Irregular and Spheroidal Galaxies can form like the Dwarf Sculptor
see: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Mateo/Mateo4.html
It was professor
F.D.A.Hartwick (University of Victoria BC Ca.) who described the interesting
extended Halo structure of more or less aligned dim Dwarf Galaxies of the Milky
Way (10 dwarfs) and Andromeda Galaxy (11 Dwarfs) See: “The Structure of the
Outer Halo of the Galaxy and its Relationship to Nearby Large-Scale Structure”
(arXiv:Astro-ph/9912083 v1 4 Dec. 1999.)
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9912/9912083.pdf
Progenitor Spirals are supposed to merge at last into
Giant Spiral Galaxies.
Within Galaxy Clusters these Spiral Galaxies are
supposed to change automatically into Giant Ellipticals, because the alignment
of the Tree alike GABHs of the different merger Galaxies inside these Giants
will become more random orientated.
However even inside Giant Elliptical Galaxies it seems
possible that some remnants of the axial GABH structure can be identified, see
: http://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/source-d.cgi?M87
If this is true,
Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies must each harbor a primordial massive GABH
which is supported by the fact that most elliptical dwarfs and even Globular
Galaxies do not show much gaseous content. (The new paradigm Black Holes are
supposed to repel gas but attract Stars)
The extended Halo
GABH is supposed to be a balancing aid for the axial stability of the
Galaxy and is influencing the forming of Spiral arms and Galaxy structure. A
lot of the Universal Dark Matter in the form of GABHs, should consequently be
concentrated inside Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies or unresolved without a
stellar globular shell,. inside extended lobes.
As a result, the contemporary idea that all Galaxies
harbor a super massive Black Hole in their nucleus should be wrong.
If black holes inside Galaxies are not primordial but
only Supernova remnants, then one could speculate that only collections of the
smallest Supernova Black Holes should be concentrated in these Galaxy nuclei.
Globular Clusters then, should harbor even bigger (the
oldest) Supernova black holes.
This would support the idea that black holes
tend to organize from small to big, from inside to outside Galaxies.
This could be a possible explanation for the
knotty structure of our Galaxy nucleus, harboring only small black holes..
A special different scenario however, for giant
Elliptical Galaxies equipped with internal GABHs is possible inside the
center of Galaxy clusters.
These Giant Ellipticals could be a combined effort of
a concentration of GABHs (Dwarf
Galaxies) connected to the ring of outer Galaxies of the Galaxy Cluster, which
have different axial orientations, all pointing into the center of the Cluster.
If these GABHs come together in the
center of Galaxy clusters, A new Giant Elliptical Galaxy could be born equipped
with old stars from other galaxies and the original Dwarf stars around these
GABHs.
Then these Ellipticals could be called "super
Dwarfs"' see the example mentioned above: of a Knotty jet inside M87.
: http://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/source-d.cgi?M87 which seem to have a much higher Dark Matter content than the
surrounding Galaxies.
Galaxy “Anchor Black Holes” (GABHs)
the origin of dark Matter and Tidal Dwarf Galaxies.
It is well known that interacting Galaxies have mostly
a relative more than average number of Dwarf Galaxy companions called “Tidal
Dwarfs”, see J.Hibbard: Tidal Dwarf
Galaxies:. http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~jhibbard/TDG/tdg.html and also http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March02/Mirabel/Mirabel5.html . The origin of this phenomenon according to my new Big Bang paradigm,
( http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ) must be found in the assumption that all
Spiral Galaxies are equipped with so called Galaxy Anchor Black Holes
(GABHs) in their outer Halos more or
less located along the axis of Galaxy
rotation and the origin of unseen Dark Matter.
Some of these GABHs are present
in the form of Elliptical Dwarf Galaxies, and the rest did not have the
evolutionary chance to capture Stars
from their neighborhood to form Dwarfs,
but are supposed to be still hidden inside the extended outer Halo of the
Spiral Galaxy.
However it is also postulated before that Most Giant Elliptical Galaxies even
Giant Spiral Galaxies are grown up in history,
by the merging of multiple smaller (primordial) Spiral Galaxies. As a result, the Dwarf Galaxy
abundance which we see today in
tidal tails of merging Galaxies, should have happened in history around ALL Giant Galaxies.
I would suggest that GABHs which
are located near their Hosts, may lose their captured Shell of tidal dwarf
stars after the Galaxy has become stable again.
It is remarkable that the number of Dwarf
Elliptical Galaxies inside Galaxy
Clusters, is relatively much higher than
in the normal field around Spiral Galaxies.
See Kraan Korteweg and T ammann (Virgo: figure 10) http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sandage3/Sand2_2.html#Figure%2010 . I assume that
Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies are able to keep their Stellar shell in place
by the different structure of surrounding
GABHs (Dark matter) within the Cluster, or by the continuous exchange of stars with the Cluster
environment.
In field Galaxies, however it is obvious that only in
tidal tails of interacting Spirals these “hidden” GABHs show up as “Tidal Dwarf Elliptical
Galaxies” , see: the Stephans Quintet
and NGC 4038.. See: http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~jhibbard/TDG/AAS198hibbard.pdf
Dark Matter extended Halo structure
of Spiral Galaxies, the origin of Lensed Einstein Crosses.
If we accept that the small Black Holes (recently
calculated about 2 million solar masses) are concentrated in the center of Galaxies and the bigger Black Holes are
concentrated inside axial “Trees” of outer Halos, then the peculiar Lensed Einstein
Crosse could be explained in a more logical way, by proposing that Einstein
Crosses are originated by the Cross like (Dark) Matter structure showing up if
we look at Spiral Galaxies EDGE ON!.
The Massive GABHs located along the extended axis of
the Galaxy combined with the (Dark ) Matter distribution in the Disk and inner
Halo form a clear structure in Cross Form if we look at it EDGE ON. Bradac et al. found these effects
in MG0414+0534, see: http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~mbradac/Work/aah3340.pdf See also N. Dalal and C.
Kochanec: This Galaxy is not seen EDGE ON, therefore these 4 images have two by two a different lensing distance by the
different amounts of Dark matter in between them and show up as a trapezium.
The symmetry axis of this trapezium should point in the same direction as the
rotational axis of the Spiral Galaxy.
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/castles/Individual/MG0414.html http://universe.gsfc.nasa.gov/press/2002/020520a.html .
Multiple times: Local- and Cosmological Time.
1: If we accept that the
"EPR correlation" or "Big Bang Entanglement", is described
as a so called instantaneous Timeless "Transactional Interpretation"
(TI) between anti-mirror particles, with opposite (+ and -) running time, then
there is something like a divine guiding system in the universal system. This
interpretation is close to the already described TI, by John.G.Cramer see: http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/qm_nl.html and described in his paper as
"instantaneous (THUS TIMELESS) action at a distance",
2: If the universal system is always anti-mirror symmetrical, without a
"broken (Big Bang) symmetry" and synchronized by EPR effects, then it
could be expected that we have to deal with copy anti-universes with
"mathematical opposite running LOCAL AND COSMOLOGICAL time".
3: If the vacuum is equipped with a crystalline lattice system of complex
oscillating Higgs alike real vacuum particles, "pushing around"
quarks and Leptons, then this oscillatory jitter of Fermions should be
interpreted as the origin of local time, This would be the first "real
time" to deal with.
4: If the vacuum particles are constantly absorbed by a not yet discovered
system of Black Holes spread around Galaxies and stars like our sun (already
recognized as "Dark Matter"), then we could come to the solution that
there is also "Cosmological Time": the time that the cosmos need to
pulsate in and out, from Big Crunch via a complex Fractal Big Bang to the
second Big Crunch.
5: In between these small
scale and large scale time scenarios, it is assumed that what we could call
medium scale pulsations or rotations can be taken into account. As an example:
The rotation of the earth around its own center and around the sun, the life
time of stars, the Sunspot cycle of 11 years, up to Galaxy center explosions
which are predicted to recur each 13,000 year, (by dr. P. LaViolette. See http://www.etheric.com/LaViolette/predict.html ).
Shape changing properties of vacuum particles.
The
linear lattices with the Planck length, represent linear (longitudinal)
energetic oscillations of real non-zero sized "hardrock" vacuum
particles, which oscillate only locally and are supposed to have "shape
changing properties". The vacuum particles are able to transport and
transmit photonic/gluonic and neutrino information with 7/4x the speed of
light. Two vacuum particles can change form by mutual collision by "shape
changing properties" into an electron/positron pair. Single vacuum
particles can also change by collision with quarks and Leptons into 6 different
shaped single "elementary" real particle shapes: gluons and photons.
Only photons and gluons can "click together" with electrons or
positrons to form compound Lepton or Quark particles.
Compound particles are
supposed to have a more or less stable connection with each other. Consequently
they have to resist the fierce attack of the continuous collision with
energetic oscillating vacuum particles, responsible for all spin. This fierce
vacuum attack, is supposed to be the base for the creation and decay processes
of compound particles: quarks, muon- and tau leptons.
The energy of the Vacuum
particle oscillations is assumed to be the ONLY energy source in our universe,
which is in balance with our synchronized dual anti-Universe, together adding
up to zero energy. The sum of kinetic and potential energies in the dual
universes, the Total Hamiltonian =0. The vacuum oscillations are supposed to
"push around" all real spinning (spin ½: neutrinos excluded)
particles. The force transfer by photons/gluons/neutrinos, is supposed to be
the result of a statistical impulse mechanism of different directional
polarizing momentum transfer of the different vacuum particles added within a
certain time unit. The charged (spinning propeller) particles are supposed
after collision with a photon (gravitons are excluded) to polarize their spin
axis into a certain direction which is influenced by the momentum transfer of
the photon. As a result the pushing power of the oscillating vacuum becomes
anti-symmetrical for a moment and a "force" is originated by the
vacuum. A curved electron trajectory in a magnetic field must be seen as an
example of this polarizing effect. Thus photons don’t transmit forces, they
transmit polarization information for Quarks or Leptons. Consequently the
Feynman diagrams have to be extended with these vacuum oscillations, coming
from 6-12 tetra/octahedron lattice directions in a new type "Feynman
diagram".
As a consequence gravitons
have no "back action", opposite to the direction of travel. Gravitons
are supposed to transfer less repulsive force in the direction of travel, than
the opposing vacuum particle momentum does as a kind of secondary "back
action".
Wave-particle duality and vacuum disruption and repair.
After creation, force
carrying REAL shaped particles (photons, gluons etc.) are supposed to transform
back into a vacuum particle shape, after a flight trajectory of less than
The collapse of the wavefunction by EPR Correlation between dual
anti-mirror universes.
Each individual vacuum
particle oscillation in our universe should be correlated and compensated, by
its copy oscillation in our dual anti-mirror universe, together adding up to
zero energy and zero information. Consequently the origin of all these vacuum
oscillations, must be found in some sort of bow tension of these vacuum
particles. All these vacuum particles have been evaporated smoothly in dual BBE
guided symmetry, out of a new Big Bang nucleus. Standard models tell us that
the Big Bang should be infinite hot. However if the energy of the BBE dual anti
mirror universes is zero, there is reason to postulate a 2-stage semi-cold
Fractal Big Bang inflation, without so called "symmetry breaking"
into a limited set of dual EPR (Einstein Podolski and Rosen) correlated or Big
Bang Entangled (BBE) universes.
The BBE is supposed to be
constantly synchronizing all these anti-mirror twin particles, between dual
anti mirror universes such as non-zero sized vacuum particles, Photons/Gluons
and elementary non-zero sized twin Quark- and Lepton particles.
However
these twin particles are living apart in dual -spatial separated- copy
anti-mirror universes. The anti-mirror twin- particles are supposed to be their
alternate instantaneous EPR correlated "conscious observers"
"outside the system" (outside each others universe). These twin
particles alternately initiate at random the collapse of each others
wavefunctions by a trigger mechanism which is possible by so called
"Floatation differences" and subsequently mediated by the so called
"instantaneous two-way EPR correlation" . Thus the absolute first
real scattering or collision of particles (vacuum particles with quarks or
leptons) into its eigenstate is the trigger for the "instantaneous"
EPR mediated collapse of the opposite twin particle in the other universe(s).
As a result, these twin particles have a fully random alternate object-subject
= observer-observed dual system relation, dependant of so called floatation
differences within each Planck time.
In Quantum Mechanics, the Self
of the observer is connected to human beings. This has led to strange ideas
about living and dead Cats and the well known idea that the moon should only
shine if it is observed by humans. In this model all so called "collapses
of the wavefunction" are the result of at random real collisions and
transformation processes of different shaped oscillating and spinning
particles, within a dual universal EPR correlated process. Consequently the
collapse of the wavefunction is INDEPENDENT of human measurement or
observation, with an exception for human volition and action itself.
Consequently the universe is described in this paper, as a Quantum Mechanical
Dual Conscious Universe.
Uncertainty.
Uncertainty on two different levels, seems to be the ruling principle of
choice in Big Bang Entangled, Dual Anti-Symmetric Copy Universes.
In contrast with Einstein’s
"God plays no dice", it is postulated that God plays with real Big
Bang Entangled rigid dice: the elementary non-zero sized particles, and the
energetic oscillating particle based chiral vacuum lattice in dual universes.
Like Gods dice, the real
particle (die) shape and structure, spin and continuous collisions are the
origin of the choices nature makes. This is the origin of a logic based
uncertainty of oscillating, spinning and colliding rigid particles, what we
would call uncertainty "of the first kind".
However all these dice and
vacuum oscillations are also dual universal correlated by Big Bang
entanglement, which introduces an extra uncertainty of the "second
kind" to the "dice form" collision uncertainty of the
"first kind". Uncertainty of the second kind is supposed to be
originated due to the at random choice nature makes which of the twin entangled
particles is the "observer"- and which is the "observed"
particle (The EPR synchronized collapse into the opposite eigenstate ) .This
random choice is only possible if the twin entangled particles are not always
exactly synchronized in the same eigenstate, they have to have floatation
differences (perturbation differences) within each Planck time.
These fluctuations are
supposed to be the origin of the alternate -but fully at random- initiating the
choice which particle is the observer and which particle is the observed one.
The eigenstate of the observed particle is supposed to be the one which is
(mirror) mimicked by the observer particle and the origin of the dual collapse
of "wavefunctions". Consequently in contrast with standard Quantum
Mechanics, each wave or particle has always a precise position (relative to the
Planck scale), also before an "experimental measurement (by humans)"
is made. Thus when we measure the position of an electron, the measurement
occur at the moment this electron interacts with the closest particle in the
detector, ,………OR it will occur slightly after the moment (but within the Planck
time) that the EPR correlated anti-mirror electron (positron) in the opposite
universe interacts with its closest particle over there.
Particles and waves can
still be described by Schroedinger equations, however particles and waves are
always "precise" located within the Planck length, they don’t
"spread out" as suggested by standard Quantum Mechanics.
This non-local description
of reality has no connection to the Hidden Variables (HV) interpretations due
to the so called "Value Definiteness" of HV, which means: all
observers defined for a QM system have definite values at "all"
times. The observer (particles) in this model are not defined before the
measurement is made and definite values at ALL times is reduced to all times
beyond the Planck time.
Thus God plays dice on
multiple dual-non-local EPR correlated universal tables, and probably on more
than two tables (universes).
Interference.
We could imagine the dual
anti-mirror universes as being each others projection through a converging
lens. If we imagine to place so called double slit experiments on both sides of
this lens, and mark the corresponding slits A, resp. B, then after we combine
these experiments into one experiment, the mystery of double slit experiments
is explained. The photon which passed slit A, in our universe, interferes with
its dual universal BBE correlated (anti-mirror shadow) particle, which passed
in our perspective through slit B, by the anti-mirror symmetry relation.
There is even reason to suggest that these anti-mirror particles are
present in or around each real particle. I suggest, that in so called
"single photon interference events" (e.g. double slit experiments)
the photonic wavefunction does not split in two equal halves. In stead:. These
photons seem to be able to split into different anti-mirror wavefunctions
representing two different particles: a shadow particle (also called mirage)
and a real particle. In the same way, quarks and leptons, can split into two different
(anti-mirror) shadow and real non-zero sized particles which can be described
by their own anti-mirror wavefunctions. If these shadow and real particles (or
shadow and real photons) reunite appropriately after passing a double slit,
single-particle interference will occur. Even complete atoms are able to
interfere by single particle interference (double slit) A new EPR
correlation concept.
The interpretation of "EPR correlation" which is assumed to be
most applicable in my model, resembles the "Transactional
Interpretation" (TI) described by John.G.Cramer in "Nonlocality and
the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" see:
http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/qm_nl.html .
The TI of J.G. Cramer, is in this model interpreted as a timeless
"handshake" between anti-mirror particles or compound particle
systems (like humans) equipped with (mathematical) opposite running time, (as
is in my model the case between two anti-mirror universes).
These anti-copy-universes are also mathematical each others opposite,
thus:
ALSO CLOCKS ARE RUNNING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION,
and the hart of my anti-Self is located at the right side of his body,
which however he calls the left side.
THIS SOUNDS LIKE A JOKE BUT IT IS FULLY CAUSAL.
Dual Universal EPR correlation is here interpreted as
"instantaneous action at a distance" even between two or more distant
anti-mirror particles or compound particle systems living in anti-mirror copy
universes with opposite running time.
It is postulated that Big Bang entangled Quantum Mechanical systems like
humans, living in spatial separated anti-mirror copy universes are equipped
with this "Retarded Handshake" possibility to create free will by
means of a VETO in decision making within a time window of 200 milliseconds.
This idea is based on the research of Benjamin Libet (in: "do we have free
will?" Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 6 no. 8-9, 1999). Other
complex systems like animals and vegetation are supposed to be equipped with a
"retarded handshake time", which is shorter than 200 ms, so they are
expected to have less Free Will..
The Human retarded Handshake time.
If we are experienced car drivers, we think that car driving is mostly a
kind of autonomous "internal" habit to react always according to our
experience on different traffic situations, based on "Our Private
Own" driving intelligence. The longer we drive cars, the less energy it
cost to keep attention on the different details of the traffic situation and
the driving itself. We could interpret this intelligence as a kind of
"hard disk" memory in our brain, which contains a lot of filed
traffic experiences, in the years we drive cars. However we often realize, that
without seeing a dangerous upcoming situation we often feel those dangerous situations
internally, and because of that feeling we often are able to prevent dangerous
driving situations. A lot of people are aware of this habit.
How is that possible? The possible CRAZY answer to this simple but deep
question is "Anti-copy-universal EPR correlation" coined "Big
Bang Entanglement". If there is "dual anti-mirror symmetry between
separated universes" managed/mediated by "Big Bang
Entanglement", then every person living in one of the anti-mirror
universes is instantaneous (non local EPR) connected to his/hers twin
anti-mirror person. It is expected, that this inter-universal non local
semi-instantaneous connection acts retarded within 200 milliseconds.
This idea is based on experiments made by Benjamin Libet.
Thus if there are 12
correlated universes we look with 24 eyes around us, with slightly different
perspectives and attention within a retarded time boundary of 200 ms.
Conclusion: we are not alone, we seem to communicate with other anti-twins
living in distant universes, who communicate with each other
semi-instantaneously (200 ms.), without the notion of it. It is supposed that
this "quality" also explains why people are able to play such a high
level of top tennis and other sports. This sounds really CRAZY, but it is a
serious option which is elaborated in this paper.
systems. Each quark, lepton, boson and even
Atoms should be somehow escorted by its
own anti-mirror companion (shadow) particle. So called mirage (shadow ) cobalt
particles were recently found in elliptical quantum corrals, by dr. D. M.
Eigler IBM (se quantum mirage effect (QME) http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html ) These mirage cobalt particles
seem to have a one-third weaker intensity than the original cobalt particle.
Recent so called "muon g-2" anomaly measurements suggest also that
the muon could have a "super symmetric" partner escort particle,
which influences its magnetic moment. (see: http://phyppro1.phy.bnl.gov/g2muon/index.shtml )
No broken Big Bang symmetry.
According to modern
physics, the EPR correlation mechanism predict that each elementary particle
that came out of the Big Bang, had a counterpart (anti-mirror spinning and
charged ) particle which was EPR correlated. These EPR correlations should now
be "washed out" due to a not well understood decoherence- and
annihilation mechanism, which created the so called "broken symmetry"
of our material Universe. However this model predict that the EPR
correlated anti-mirror symmetry between particles is still there, in the form
of dual universal symmetry synchronizing mechanism called "Big Bang entanglement"
which should exist between dual spatial separated copy universes.
As a result, these ideas
introduced a new ontology of physics, and a new particle-wave-vacuum
principle. The vacuum is supposed to be filled up with real so called
non-zero sized energetic oscillating so called "Higgs-virgin particles"
(Dark Energy). These linear oscillations should have the Planck length, and are
supposed to be the base of a quantum lattice , with the geometry of an
incomplete complex chiral crystal lattice. By comparing different real 3-D
octa-/tetrahedron lattice models, it came out, that there are at least two
possible chiral vacuum lattice models possible, with a left- and a right hand
spiraling geometry. ....
The "3-D Chiral Space"
a NEW chiral space filler.
It is possible to fill
space with a network of alternating octahedrons and tetrahedrons (with edges of
identical length), which we will call "Standard Tetrahedron-Octahedron
Space" (STOS) . This is the result which we get by so called "Close
Sphere Packing" models and is also called an "Isotropic Vector
Matrix". If we cut away special chosen octahedron edges present in a STOS,
then a so called "Truncated Incomplete Tetrahedron Space" filling
system (TITS) is created. These Truncated Tetrahedrons have the form of what is
generally called by Buckminster Fuller, a (3v- or) "3 Frequency Truncated
Tetrahedron", which means that all the edges of the truncated tetrahedron
have the same length. The TITS system is incomplete because at four sides of the
truncated tetrahedron, an empty "tetrahedron shaped cavity" is left
behind in space. Thus the TITS system, leaves a second system behind of smaller
(1v) Tetrahedrons which are all connected ONLY by their vertices, thus they
don’t have edges in common.
This incomplete space
filling system will look at what we will call: a "Singular 3-D STAR
SPACE".. (3D-SS) .These
tetrahedrons are only connected by their vertices, which makes it possible to
rotate these tetrahedrons in string series of 3 left or right, without
"torsion" problems for the system itself. At both ends of a string of
3 rotated tetrahedrons, it is needed that there is one stable (non rotated)
tetrahedron at both sides, fixed to the original non-chiral Star lattice. The rotational "torsion"
possibilities of the vertices are
supposed to be the only boundary condition for the Chirality of the vacuum
lattice of space. It is assumed that after rotation of these tetrahedrons, the
whole lattice will "shrink" a little bit in volume until the vertices
boundary condition of torsion is reached.
At the same time there is a
second 3D-SS system possible, if we RE-introduce within each truncated
tetrahedron the so called "internal tetrahedron". As a result there
are two non-connected chiral SODS systems possible in 3-D space.
So the only space
possibility I could find for a "chiral oscillating quantum space"
with edges of equal length, is the single or double "3-D STAR SPACE" .
A new causal Particle-Wave duality.
It is well known, that the
concept of Special Relativity of time, space and simultaneity as proposed in
the Special Theory of Relativity, is proven to be logically untenable.
With the arguments described here, a causal explanation and 4 tests for LLI
(Local Lorentz Invariance) effects is presented.
It is postulated that real
non-zero-sized photon/gluon particles are created by transformation of real
vacuum particles due to collision of these vacuum particles with Quarks and
Leptons. Photon particles are postulated to travel over a distance of less than
Fresnel drag.
So called "Fresnel drag" must also be interpreted as the
result of the "1cm postulate" acting inside transparent matter like
glass or water. The
How the Quantum vacuum Mimics the isotropic lightspeed above the
The most indicative
experiments for some kind of lightspeed anisotropy are clearly those made by
Dayton Miller at Mount Wilson (LA) in 1926.see: M. Allais and H.A. Munera: http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-272/aflb272p463.htm
http://allais.maurice.free.fr/English/media12-1.htm The results of these experiments can be
fully understood if we assume that these results are influenced by the next
phenomena. The next assumptions are in full agreement with the well known
Stellar Aberration and secondly with the temperature polarity of the Solar
system relative to the so called 2,7 degree Cosmic Background Radiation.
1: The LASOF (Local Anti-Symmetrical
Oscillating Vacuum Frame) effect, is assumed to create isotropic lightspeed
bubbles (or double cones) on both sides of the Massive object axial relative to
the velocity vector(s) of motion or ether drift . This must be the
origin that GPS satellites don’t show (one way)
lightspeed anisotropies under elevation angles with the horizon of more
than 5-10 degrees. Consequently I assume that LASOF is the origin that all
lightspeed differences above these 5 degrees horizon elevation are compensated. Thus the LASOF bubbles are
supposed to be the origin, that lightspeed differences are only measurable at
high elevations such as mountain summits, and only if the “Ether drift” direction is parallel with the Earth surface at the
place of measurement.
2. According to the result of D. Miller (1926)
we are forced to assume that there are two “ether drift effects into two
directions” .
A: an ether drift direction parallel with the
Velocity Vector of the Earth’s Orbit around the sun, due to the orbital
velocity.
B: an ether drift direction parallel with the
Axial direction of the Solar Planetary plane, induced by the two Solar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs) located at
either side of the Planetary plane “eating the vacuum” with the result of a
secondary ether drift effect. (see under: SABH)
3: A possible reduced but very subtle Lorentz contraction effect on the
length of rods pointing into the direction of motion, such as the contraction
of interferometer arms of D. Miller could have suffered, which
could be partly the origin of the reduction of
the measured lightspeed differences.
If we combine these three effects it is obvious
that the orbital motion of the Earth itself around the sun, is only visible in
a suppressed way by the Dayton Miller results ONLY on two dates: 1st. august
1925 and 8th February 1926.
As a result it should now be possible to design
new experiments at higher altitudes above the earth, on mountain summits or
between satellites, to tackle the problem and to prove Einstein wrong.
Local Potential Spacetime.
Gravity influences the local oscillation pattern and oscillatory energy
of vacuum particles and thus the decrease of time rate. The oscillations are
responsible for the jittering pattern of mass carrying particles by constant
collisions, and thus for the exact ticking rate of atom clocks. It is now
reasonable to accept, that a fast moving clock will decrease its time rate
according to the general relativity rules, by its absolute speed through the
universal vacuum frame. This frame has local properties, which are influenced
by massive objects and black holes. This is supposed to be the real base for
the solution of the so called Twin paradox. The astronaut who is accelerating
away and is coming back to his twin brother, (who does not accelerate in the
universal reference frame), will have a decreased time rate relative to his
twin brother.. Consequently the local oscillation quality of vacuum
particles together with the absolute speed of a mass through the universal
vacuum reference frame, is the origin of local time, which is mimicking the
relativity rules.
Humans and the Cosmic Law of Free choice between Hatred and
Forgivingness .
We humans are quantum
mechanical systems, who are only able to follow the quantum mechanical rules of
the Universe, which we merely partly know and understand. Consequently we have
to search and innovate these rules to find out who we are, and how reality can
be described ontologically . Our understanding of the world is restricted by an
ontological gap, between scientific language and reality, therefore we have to
search for a bridge. This paper is an attempt to describe possible outlines of
that bridge.
It is postulated, that the
basic features of the Universe must be of a type that allows the evolution of
dual mirror symmetric, EPR correlated observers outside the "system",
which means that "we and elementary particles" are always correlated
by "instantaneous action at-a-distance" acting between dual
correlated universes. If we take a Chiral Quantum Mechanical Universe as a
"system", then The Universe that we know is only a half-truth,
without a "broken symmetry", and we should have a mutual observer-
and guiding relation with at least one spatial separated anti-mirror Universe.
Consequently, the so
called "superposition- and collapse events" in the universe are only
the half truth, all
these events are based on "instantaneous information flow" called
"actions at a distance" or "Big Bang entanglement " between
at least two spatial separated events in different universes. Even if we
measure a collapse event in the laboratory between "local" related
particles in an EPR experiment, which is also supposed to have an instantaneous
non-local collapse relation, this dual universal "BB entanglement"
should be also present on top of it.
Then I suggest that each
elementary particle is instantaneous observed and/or guided without the time
for "reflection", by its distant shadow anti-particle in our dual
anti-mirror Universe. The difference with human choices is supposed to be, that
humans are equipped with enough time for reflection (retarded EPR correlation
or retarded Big Bang entanglement ) to develop what we call Free Will by
Vetoing urges and intentions (Benjamin Libet), and become aware of moral
differences, and even altruism and forgivingness.
Consequently if this
increase in reflection time is related to the evolutionary increase of
complexity of cells, the goal of human evolution seems to be the creation of
moral awareness, made by animate dual synchronized logic quantum computers with
enough time for "reflection", like our dual synchronized brains.
The Cosmic Law seems to
be, that we are only free to VETO our deterministic urges and intentions and
only Free to VETO those urges based on egoistic or Altruistic awareness.
However it is supposed that we never will be able to prove some kind of
relation between our life after dead and the way we have managed to become
"moral aware" and were able to choose for egoism or altruism, for
hatred or forgivingness, as described in the bible. If we could prove such a
relation, we would not have this RESTRICTED VETOING FREE WILL any more.
Thus: Descarte’s: "I think therefore
I am" should change into: "I am a QM system, which is always
non-local instantaneous EPR correlated, and in competition for Free Will by
VETOING the choices of my opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe,
therefore We are! We are dual co-authors of our common life".
Stephen Hawking.
Stephen Hawking explains in
"A Brief History of Time":
"We could still
imagine that there is a set of laws that determines events completely for some
supernatural being, who could observe the present state of the universe without
disturbing it. However, such models of the universe are not of much interest to
us mortals. It seems better to employ the principle known as Occam’s razor and
cut all the features of the theory which cannot be observed"
I think we could change
Hawking’s statement a little. If we change "for some supernatural
being" into "by EPR non local instantaneous correlation" between
dual anti-mirror universes with a chiral vacuum, then this model is of real
interest to us mortals. However probably we need modern mathematical stuff like
Operator algebra, Poisson manifolds, K-theory, Lie-groupoids, Lie-algebroids,
and von Neumann algebra’s, etc. to prove these ideas.
Successful experiments
carried out to test the famous "
These universes has to be
spatially separated and are supposed to be each others "observers".
The oscillating quantum vacuum is supposed to play a crucial role, in the
origin of matter or anti-matter, energy, mass, gravity and the deterministic
role of non-local correlated forms of particles . God really plays dice with
real 3-D formed dice: the quarks, leptons and bosons which are supposed to
posses real physical 3-D form at the moment they interact. Nature is by these
3-D particle forms (which could be interpreted as a kind of hidden variables)
fully deterministic combined with real random collision of particles, for non
DNA based matter. Animate matter is semi deterministic, it seems to have more
or less the possibility of choice by veto action (or reflection) due to a sort
of retarded transactional EPR correlation between dual copy universes.
Vigier-Bohm, and Salam ideas.
This model combines two
different quantum mechanical ideas, suggested by David Bohm and Jean Paul
Vigier described in: "Infinite potentials, the time and lives of David
Bohm" (1996) by D. Peat : Quotations: 1, "D. Bohm argued, that the
quantum potential (also dubbed pilot wave) guides the electron in a non-mechanical
way. In this paper I will use this idea which may be compared with: "Big
Bang entanglement". 2, J.P.Vigier favored explaining the process in terms
of some sort of underlying mechanism as an energetic sub-quantum fluid
"pushing the electron around" . {In this new Physical model, I will
call this sub-quantum fluid the energetic oscillating "Higgs-virgin
vacuum"} . 3, Abdus Salam considered together with Jogesh Pati, in 1974
that Quarks and Leptons are made out of 8 compound Preons (4 chromons, and 4
Flavons).
If quarks and leptons
(neutrinos excluded) are able to absorb directional energy from the vacuum,
they should have knowledge at any time about their speed and direction in
space. The solution this new model suggests is: to re-introduce the not so
weird idea of universal symmetry by postulating the idea of the existence
of synchronized "Dual anti mirror Universes", which are EPR
correlated which is coined: "Big Bang entangled down to the Planck
scale".
As a consequence, the
second law of thermodynamics has to be interpreted as to be valid only at the
same time in both Universes. Everything, even YOURSELF, has to be interpreted
as non Cartesian DUALLY EXISTENT. The Cartesian "Cogito Ergo Sum"
"I think therefore I am" has to be changed into: " I am a QM
system, which is always non-local instantaneous EPR correlated, and in
alternate time competition for free will with my opposite anti-I: We think by
alternate doubt, therefore We are! (alternating non marionettes) see TESTS,
Libet)
As a consequence, this
model points into the direction of a Universe, that is at the same time
MECHANISTIC, by oscillating colliding and spinning real non-zero sized
particles , and HOLISTIC, by Big Bang Entanglement (BBE) acting at different
levels of existence from particles up to humans.
Many Worlds Interpretations.
There are more Many Worlds
Interpretations. David Deutsch wrote: "Experiments have confirmed Quantum
Physics, and the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is the only known
non-paradoxical interpretation of it. All these many worlds are real, and I am
in one of them. The universe is described by a wave equation. Essentially, the
equation says that at each moment of time, the world (Universe) can split into
many worlds. Each world is one of the possible things that can happen at that
point, and these worlds are interacting with each other. This is the "many
worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics."
However, a well known
ontological problem of this Many Worlds Interpretation is the bubbling up of
billions of universes each split second, caused by the fact that all quantum
mechanical possibilities has to be realized and there is no wavefunction
collapse. The number of universes in MWI is related to the frequency of quantum
events also interpreted as the frequency of branched histories. At the same
time MWI says that interference phenomena provide evidence of multiple
universes, because particles interfere between two universes: (double slit
experiments reveal interference between neighboring universes, according to D.Deutsch)
the real universe in which I live and a shadow universe.
I first suggest that
these problems could be solved if we translate shadow and real universes of
David Deutsch into shadow and real "LOCAL" particles. The real
particles are always accompanied by these shadow particles until they are
measured in a specific way. (e.g. for interference in double slit, or in
Stern-Gerlach or Mach-Zehnder experiments) There is reason to suggest that
these anti-mirror particles are present in or around each real particle. I
suggest, that in so called "single photon interference events" (e.g
double slit experiments) the photonic wavefunctions do not split in two equal
halves.
In contrast, these photons
split into different anti-mirror wavefunctions representing also two different
shadow and real LOCAL particles. In the same way, quarks and leptons,
(neutrinos excluded) can split into two different (anti-mirror) shadow and real
non-zero sized particles which can be described by their own anti-mirror
wavefunctions. If these shadow and real particles (or shadow and real photons)
reunite appropriately , single-particle interference will occur. So called
mirage particles were last year found in elliptical quantum corrals, by dr. D.
M. Eigler IBM (see: quantum mirage effect http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html )
Secondly I suggest that multiple D. Deutsch universes
could also be interpreted as identical synchronized anti-mirror universes
spatially separated and non-local EPR correlated. Thus in this paper "many
worlds" is interpreted differently from "Deutsch’s MWI", the
wavefunction collapse is still incorporated as an "objective
phenomenon" between spatial separated universes. There are EPR correlated
observers "outside" the system, which are positioned in the opposite
dual universes. "Hidden variables" or real particle forms are
responsible for the chance element in nature, and together with a local
oscillation pattern of real non-zero sized vacuum particles (dubbed
Higgs-Virgin particles) they are responsible for the exact ticking rate of atom
clocks and they are the origin of time and mass all according relativity rules.
We.
The very bizarre
anti-Cartesian but causal result of this model is, that YOU are not what you
thought you were: a single individual. You have to deal with a real dual
anti-mirror Self, which- in your perspective- lives in opposite time in an
other universe. Consequently WE and not I found some support for this
phenomenon in the well known volitional act experiments made by Benjamin Libet,
and we expect that future adapted "Libet experiments" should give
possibilities to falsify or support this result.
If we accept that the
increase of duration of so called "retarded EPR correlation" is an
evolutionary gift, which gives humans more time than animals to have
"reflection" for Vetoing an urge or intention , Then the Tree of Good
and Evil in the Paradise was a FALSE EXCUSE to throw Mankind out. It was an
evolutionary necessity that humans made complex social conventions (moral) and
created differences between good and evil. Thus it seems even to be one of the
evolutionary goals of the universe: to develop Love and Hatred, Peace and
Aggression, and the evolutionary choice for humans to base social conventions
(or moral ideas, leading to stable social systems) on these differences.
Consequently, we seem to have more time for "reflection" than animals
to compare our intentions and urges with our moral standards and to calculate
our choices with our intelligent potential, but we may be called really FREE
(freed from calculatory constraint) if we make altruistic choices.
Particles and Waves.
Beyond contemporary
physics, we postulate: a causal world of real sub-quantum level structured-or
shaped, non-energetic Quarks and Leptons, floating in-, energized - and even
propelled by a vacuum sea of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) driven-, oscillating
real Higgs-virgin vacuum particles. All Higgs-virgin oscillations and real
particles, are supposed to be instantaneously Big Bang entangled with their
anti-particles in the opposite anti mirror universe. Higgs-virgin particles
will change form by individual collision with real quarks and lepton particles,
into different kinds of real photon/gluon particles. Two mutual colliding
Higgs-virgin particles can transform into a real electron-positron pair.
Electrons and positrons can
merge with one or two photons to configure compound quarks and compound leptons
(only mu and Tau leptons). The electron, positron, neutrinos, and photons are
"single particles". Neutrinos can only be produced by collision
between Higgs-virgin particles and compound quarks or compound leptons in decay
processes. They can be "transformed" by collision processes out of
compound electrons, positrons and photons/gluons, ONLY if these particles
are a compound part of compound quarks or compound leptons. Reminder: All
quarks, leptons, and Higgs-virgin bosons, photons and gluons, are dual
universal EPR correlated for the collapse of their wavefunction.
Quarks and Leptons
(neutrinos excluded) don’t have force potentials themselves, in contrast with
Higgs-virgin particles, Neutrinos and single Photons. Photons/Gluons and
Neutrinos are equipped with ONLY REPELLING OR GUIDING force potentials. If
Photons/Gluons and Neutrinos are created by changing the shape of a unifying
vacuum particle , they automatically re-transform after ca.
There are 6 different
specific photon shapes: one general photon, 2x magnetic photons (North and
South), 2x electric photons (plus and minus) and the graviton. The origin of the collapse is made
by the random interaction of the real spinning quarks and leptons with the
additional Higgs-virgin oscillation (the photonic wavefunction) of the vacuum
particles. In contrast with modern physics we suggest that the wavefunction
of MASS: quarks and leptons, (neutrinos excluded) is originated by the
continuous real particle collisions with the Higgs-virgin vacuum particles.
Therefore these material wavefunctions should be interpreted as
vibrations of spinning real particles, different from photonic wavefunctions,
and propelled by the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum particles.
Collision induced Gravity and Mass.
Mach supposed, that inertia
was originated by the gravitational influence of all existing mass in the
universe. As is explained below, this model assumes that inertia is originated
by the influence of the local oscillatory qualities of the spaceframe lattice
and the absolute speed of the object through this spaceframe.
The vacuum oscillations
equipped with the additional photon oscillation (wave) packets, are supposed to
be the only universal energy source, pushing around non-energetic quarks and
Leptons, each with a specific real propeller form and a specific mass. Gravity is the net result of the repelling
a-symmetric momentum transfer, averaged over many collisions and originated by
the particles of the Oscillating Quantum Vacuum (OQV) , colliding from all
spaceframe sides (12x) on Quarks and Leptons. It is postulated that short
living photon particles (less than
Mass is the Lorentz covariant Capacity
(Cg) related to the local vacuum reference frame of the Quarks or Leptons to transform
a specific number (a part) of the colliding vacuum particles into the same
number of gravitons per local time unit. Thus: E=Cg.c^2 and mass and even
energy, is based on discrete entities named gravitons. Gravitational mass and
Inertial mass are equivalent due to this phenomenon, however the graviton
radiation direction seems to be related to the scattering process induced by
the absolute object velocity through the oscillating spaceframe lattice of the
vacuum..
In cases of mass
acceleration relative to the local vacuum reference frame (the local
oscillating vacuum lattice), the local accelerated mass (and the graviton
production capacity Cg) of an object, increases Lorentz covariant with the
gamma factor. The clock speed of an object which is accelerated relative to the
local vacuum reference frame however, decreases also Lorentz covariant with the
gamma factor.
Thus the number of
gravitons radiated by the object per local (object) time unit, increases twice
with the so called gamma factor. "Lorentz polarization" of the
propeller formed Quarks and Leptons relative to the vacuum frame, is supposed
to be the origin of the former effect. It is assumed in contrast with
Relativity, that the absolute speed of a mass through the vacuum spaceframe
lattice is the origin of the Lorentz covariant particle polarization, which
determines the object mass and Inertia.
Based on normal scattering
distributions, it is proposed that the trajectories of the radiated gravitons,
which are produced by collision with vacuum particles, will be concentrated (or
polarized) more or less in the form of a cone. The central cone axis will point
parallel with the propagation direction of the massive particle, and the top of
the cone will be directed into the propagation direction and fixed to the
massive particle itself. Thus if we take a fast spinning massive wheel, this
"Cone Effect" is the origin that more gravitons are radiated more or
less into the direction of the plane of the wheel, within a V-shaped cross
section profile, relative to the center of the wheel.
Multiple dual correlated dice and Schroedinger’s Cat.
Einstein used to say
"God plays no dice". In contrast with Einstein, we postulate that God
plays with real dice: the elementary particles. The real particle form (or configuration),
spin and continuous collisions are the origin of choices nature makes, which
seems to be the origin of a clockwork causal universe. However all these dice
are dual universal correlated by Big Bang entanglement. God plays dice on
multiple dual-EPR correlated universal tables. The micro fluctuations and tiny
differences in position on the Planck scale, between these correlated
particles, is the causal origin of uncertainty!
Not only elementary
particles but also spinning billiard balls are instantaneously anti-mirror
correlated between Dual Universes. Only humans and perhaps even animals have a
"retarded transactional collapse" correlation, which is supposed to
be the origin of Free Will. (appendix. p.: 45-46).
There are no superpositions of states which lead to paradoxes like
Schroedinger’s cat, the wavefunction of photons or quarks and leptons may
collapse in one universe, by its own random interaction with the quantum vacuum
(Gods playing table). There is a superposition of states between dual universal
correlated, or EPR laboratory correlated waves or particles. However, the first
collapsing particle instantaneous collapses the other particle, by this
instantaneous EPR correlation at a distance.
The Higgs-virgin mechanism and 6 quantum clocks.
The so called Higgs
mechanism which was originally invented by modern Physics as a mathematical
tool, to compensate for the infinite energies measured on Quarks and Leptons,
should be interpreted as the basic and real Universal oscillating energy
source, which is Big Bang Entangled and nullified by our Dual anti-mirror
Universe (together: negative and positive vacuum energies add up to Zero energy
!). Consequently, the extraction of Higgs-virgin vacuum energy is fundamental,
but instantaneously compensated (nullified) in our Dual anti-mirror Universe by
BB Entanglement and at the same time, although it seems paradoxical, the second
Law of thermodynamics extended for both universes is not violated.
If the QM vacuum is formed
by oscillating vacuum particles, oscillating along the edges of a chiral
complex octahedron/tetrahedron lattice structure, and each vacuum particle is
representing a dual universal EPR correlated clock, due to instantaneous EPR
correlated symmetry with its anti-universal oscillating vacuum particle. Then
we could count on each vacuum octahedron node 6 different dual universal EPR
correlated clocks oscillating along the edges of this complex lattice.
If the light speed isotropy
on Earth is originated by non-isotropic sinusoidal oscillations of these
particles ( the LASOF), which compensate exactly for the speed of the Earth
through the Solar framed complex vacuum lattice, then each vacuum lattice
should oscillate in a different a-symmetric sinusoidal way, and with the same
period of a complete oscillation. This could be counted as 6 different (Earth
orbital direction dependant) oscillating clocks for each vacuum lattice,
influencing the light speed and all the other Relativity effects.